Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31939520›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2020

Evaluation of the physical and antifungal effects of chlorhexidine diacetate incorporated into polymethyl methacrylate.

Caroline Vieira Maluf, Luciana Vieira Peroni, Lívia Rodrigues Menezes, Wagner Coutinho, Eduardo José Veras Lourenço, Daniel de Moraes Telles

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Antifungal Polymeric Materials and Nanocomposites.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline Vieira MalufUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Prótese Dentária, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7416-4700
Luciana Vieira PeroniUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Prótese Dentária, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8092-5035
Lívia Rodrigues MenezesUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Macromoléculas Eloisa Mano, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Wagner CoutinhoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Eduardo José Veras LourençoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Prótese Dentária, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7163-8138
Daniel de Moraes TellesUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Prótese Dentária, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9576-4342
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the physical properties and antifungal activities of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) acrylic resins after the incorporation of chlorhexidine diacetate salt (CDA). METHODOLOGY: First, acrylic resin specimens were fabricated with Vipi Cor® and DuraLay® resins with and without the incorporation of 0.5%, 1.0% or 2.0% CDA. The residual monomer and CDA release were measured at intervals ranging from 2 hours to 28 days using ultraviolet spectrometry combined with high-performance liquid chromatography. The antifungal activity against C. albicans was evaluated with the agar diffusion method. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to analyze the degree of resin conversion. Finally, the water sorption values of the resins were also measured.

resultsThe incorporated CDA concentration significantly changed the rate of CDA release (p<0.0001); however, the brand of the material appeared to have no significant influence on drug release. Subsequently, the inhibition zones were compared between the tested groups and within the same brand, and only the comparisons between the CDA 2% and CDA 1% groups and between the CDA 1% and CDA 0.5% groups failed to yield significant differences. Regarding the degrees of conversion, the differences were not significant and were lower only in the CDA 2% groups. Water sorption was significantly increased at the 1.0% and 2.0% concentrations.

conclusionsWe concluded that the incorporation of CDA into PMMA-based resins enabled the inhibition of C. albicans growth rate, did not alter the degrees of conversion of the tested resins and did not change the release of residual monomers.

Indexed as

Acrylic ResinsAntifungal AgentsCandida albicansChlorhexidineChromatography, High Pressure LiquidMaterials TestingPolymethyl MethacrylateReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredTime FactorsWaterAcrylic ResinsAntifungal AgentsChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconatePolymethyl MethacrylateWater

Identifiers

PMID31939520
PMCPMC6919199
OpenAlexW2999124641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.