Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31939505›Full record

ReviewRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2020

BABY-LED WEANING, AN OVERVIEW OF THE NEW APPROACH TO FOOD INTRODUCTION: INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW.

Melisa Sofia Gomez, Ana Paula Toneto Novaes, Janaina Paulino da Silva, Luciane Miranda Guerra, Rosana de Fátima Possobon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Complementary feeding: Should baby be leading the way?Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Baby-led weaning, an overview of the new approach to food introduction: integrative literature review.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melisa Sofia GomezUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7718-140X
Ana Paula Toneto NovaesUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6558-1270
Janaina Paulino da SilvaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3232-3838
Luciane Miranda GuerraUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7542-7717
Rosana de Fátima PossobonUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6179-3030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the scientific literature on Baby-Led Weaning with an integrative literature review to identify risks and benefits. DATA SOURCE: The databases used were: National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE), Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS - Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde), US National Library of Medicine (PubMed), and Virtual Health Library (BVS - Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde) in December 2017. The inclusion criteria established were publications in English with the descriptor "baby-led weaning" in the heading, abstract, or keywords, classified as original articles, of primary nature, and available online and in full. We excluded review articles, editorials, letters to the editor, critical commentaries, and books on the subject, as well as articles not available in full and duplicates. DATA SUMMARY: We identified 106 articles, of which 17 met the selection criteria. The Baby-Led Weaning method was significantly associated with the baby's satiety, the start of complementary feeding, and adequacy of weight gain. On the other hand, choking and the intake of micronutrients were negatively associated, however with no statistical differences.

conclusionsDespite the benefits found, the risks still deserve attention and should be investigated with longitudinal randomized controlled studies to ensure the safety of the method when practiced exclusively.

Indexed as

WeaningAirway ObstructionBreast FeedingCase-Control StudiesChild HealthCross-Sectional StudiesFeeding BehaviorHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaLongitudinal StudiesSatiety ResponseWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID31939505
PMCPMC6958549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.