Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31939239›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2020

[Short-term effectiveness comparison between robotic-guided percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation and traditional open internal fixation in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures].

Shu Lin, Jiang Hu, Lun Wan, Liuyi Tang, Yue Wang, Yang Yu, Wei Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. [TiRobot-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac cannulated screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injury with sacral variations].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. [Robot-guided percutaneous kyphoplasty in treatment of multi-segmental osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shu LinDepartment of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science·Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P.R.China.
Jiang HuDepartment of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science·Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P.R.China.hujiang8711@163.com.
Lun WanDepartment of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science·Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P.R.China.
Liuyi TangDepartment of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science·Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P.R.China.
Yue WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science·Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P.R.China.
Yang YuDepartment of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science·Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P.R.China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science·Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P.R.China.
Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare short-term effectiveness between robot-guided percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation and traditional open internal fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

methodsThe clinical data of 52 cases of thoracolumbar fracture without neurological injury symptoms admitted between January 2018 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into minimally invasive group (24 cases, treated with robot-assisted percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation) and open group (28 cases, treated with traditional open internal fixation). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the general data such as gender, age, cause of injury, fracture segment, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS), preoperative back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, fixed segment height, and fixed segment kyphosis Cobb angle (

resultsThe operation time of the minimally invasive group was significantly longer than that of the open group, but the intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization time were significantly shorter than those of the open group (

conclusionRobot-assisted percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation for thoracolumbar fractures has significant advantages in intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, and early postoperative effectiveness and other aspects, and the effect of fracture reduction is good.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSpinal FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansLumbar VertebraeRetrospective StudiesThoracic VertebraeTreatment Outcomeinternal fixationminimally invasiveRobotthoracolumbar fracture

Identifiers

PMID31939239
PMCPMC8171838
OpenAlexW3013136308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.