Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31939003›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020

Automated Cardiovascular Pathology Assessment Using Semantic Segmentation and Ensemble Learning.

Tony Lindsey, Jin-Ju Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tony LindseyIntelligent Systems, NASA Ames Research Center, Room 250, M/S N269-2, Mountain View, CA, 94035, USA. antonia.e.lindsey@nasa.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-7267-4069
Jin-Ju LeeIntelligent Systems, NASA Ames Research Center, Room 250, M/S N269-2, Mountain View, CA, 94035, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging provides high spatial resolution, enabling improved extraction of important functional and morphological features for cardiovascular disease staging. Segmentation of ventricular cavities and myocardium in cardiac cine sequencing provides a basis to quantify cardiac measures such as ejection fraction. A method is presented that curtails the expense and observer bias of manual cardiac evaluation by combining semantic segmentation and disease classification into a fully automatic processing pipeline. The initial processing element consists of a robust dilated convolutional neural network architecture for voxel-wise segmentation of the myocardium and ventricular cavities. The resulting comprehensive volumetric feature matrix captures diagnostic clinical procedure data and is utilized by the final processing element to model a cardiac pathology classifier. Our approach evaluated anonymized cardiac images from a training data set of 100 patients (4 pathology groups, 1 healthy group, 20 patients per group) examined at the University Hospital of Dijon. The top average Dice index scores achieved were 0.940, 0.886, and 0.849 for structure segmentation of the left ventricle (LV), myocardium, and right ventricle (RV), respectively. A 5-ary pathology classification accuracy of 90% was recorded on an independent test set using the trained model. Performance results demonstrate the potential for advanced machine learning methods to deliver accurate, efficient, and reproducible cardiac pathological assessment.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSemanticsHeartHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance Imaging2D U-NetCardiac cine-MRIClassificationFeature selectionSemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID31939003
PMCPMC7256130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.