Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31938957›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2020

A molecular prevalence survey on Anaplasma infection among domestic ruminants in Khartoum State, Sudan.

Nagwa M Eisawi, Abdel Rahim M El Hussein, Dina A Hassan, Azza B Musa, Mohammed O Hussien, Khalid A Enan, Mohammed A Bakheit

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Snapshot Study of the Family Anaplasmataceae,Journal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nagwa M EisawiCentral Laboratory, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, P.O. Box 7099, Khartoum, Sudan. nagwa.eisawi@gmail.com.
Abdel Rahim M El HusseinCentral Veterinary Research Laboratory (CVRL), Animal Resources Research Corporation (ARRC), P.O. Box 8067, El Amarat, Khartoum, Sudan.
Dina A HassanCentral Laboratory, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, P.O. Box 7099, Khartoum, Sudan.
Azza B MusaCentral Laboratory, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, P.O. Box 7099, Khartoum, Sudan.
Mohammed O HussienCentral Laboratory, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, P.O. Box 7099, Khartoum, Sudan.
Khalid A EnanCentral Laboratory, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, P.O. Box 7099, Khartoum, Sudan.
Mohammed A BakheitMAST Diagnostica GmbH, Reinfeld, Germany.
Ministry of Higher Education And Scientific Research · SDAgricultural Research Corporation · SD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted in Khartoum State, Sudan to determine the prevalence and the risk factors associated with Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species infections in domestic ruminants. Blood samples were collected from a total of 594 animals from 32 different farms distributed in the three provinces of Khartoum State. Among the 196 cattle, 200 sheep, and 198 goats examined using PCR, 13.27%, 32.50%, and 35.86% were infected with Anaplasma spp., respectively, with an overall prevalence of 27.27%. Cattle were infected with A. marginale (10.71%), A. centrale (2.04%), and A. ovis (0.51%), while sheep and goats were infected with A. ovis being significantly higher compared with cattle. No Ehrlichia spp. was detected in domestic ruminant in Khartoum State. Prevalence rates of Anaplasma infections were highly associated with breed, location, season, and sex. The prevalence rates of Anaplasma infection were significantly higher in exotic goat breeds compared with indigenous, and the infection in sheep and cattle was significantly higher in summer and in autumn in goats. The Anaplasma spp. infection rate in goats was significantly higher in females. The infection rate was also significantly higher in Khartoum North in both sheep and goats. It could be concluded that Anaplasma infection is prevalent in small and large ruminants in Khartoum State. Therefore, further studies on the epidemiology of anaplasmosis, possible tick, lice, and flea vectors and reservoirs in Sudan are important.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnaplasmosisAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesEhrlichiaEhrlichiosisFemaleGoat DiseasesGoatsMalePhylogenyPrevalenceRuminantsSheepSheep DiseasesAnaplasmaCattleGoatKhartoum StatePCRSheep

Identifiers

PMID31938957
OpenAlexW3000508547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.