Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31938955›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2020

Multicenter prospective phase II trial of nivolumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma.

Motoo Nomura, Isao Oze, Toshiki Masuishi, Tomoya Yokota, Hironaga Satake, Shunichiro Iwasawa, Ken Kato, Masashi Andoh

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Motoo NomuraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. excell@hkg.odn.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5967-0610
Isao OzeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Toshiki MasuishiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 54 Kawahara-choSakyo-ku, ShogoinKyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Tomoya YokotaDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Hironaga SatakeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 54 Kawahara-choSakyo-ku, ShogoinKyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Shunichiro IwasawaDepartment of Respirology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Ken KatoDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Masashi AndohDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 54 Kawahara-choSakyo-ku, ShogoinKyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Aichi Cancer Center · JPChiba University · JPKobe City Medical Center General Hospital · JPKyoto University Hospital · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMucosal melanoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with poorer response compared with cutaneous melanoma. Prospective trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma have not been reported. PURPOSE: This phase II trial assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab monotherapy for unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma. PATIENTS AND

methodsEligibility criteria were as follows: histological diagnosis of unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma; age ≥ 20 years; ECOG performance status 0 or 1; and with measurable lesions. Patients received nivolumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, disease control rate, and toxicity.

resultsTwenty patients were enrolled between December 2014 and July 2017. Two patients without measurable lesions and one patient with uveal melanoma were excluded from analysis of efficacy. The best overall RR was 23.5%. One patient achieved a complete response, three partial response, and five stable disease as their best response. The median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% CI 1.2-2.8). The median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 3.5 to not reached). The 1-year overall survival was 50.0% (95% CI 25.9-70.0%). Treatment-related adverse events of grades 3 or 4 occurred in 15% (3/20) of the patients. Grade 3 adverse events were resolved by corticosteroid treatment.

conclusionAlthough this trial met the primary endpoint, the RR was still unsatisfactory. Therefore, further treatment development is required.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMucous MembraneNivolumabProgression-Free SurvivalProspective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNivolumabImmune checkpoint inhibitorMetastatic melanomaMucosal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID31938955
OpenAlexW3000619658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.