Trial reportWorld journal of urology2020
Assessment of the effects of autologous muscle-derived cell injections on urethral sphincter morphometry using 3D/4D ultrasound.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implantation of Autologous Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells Combined with Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe primary objective was to evaluate the effect of autologous muscle-derived cell (AMDC) injections on the urethral sphincter morphometry compared to placebo injections. Secondary aims were to explore the reduction of stress incontinence episode frequency (IEF) and factors associated with the efficacy of AMDC.
methodsThis prospective randomized-controlled study compared the urethral sphincter volumes of participants who had received either an intra-sphincteric injection of 4 cc AMDC in injection media or 4 cc placebo solution, using a transperineal 3D/4D ultrasound at baseline and at 12 months. The reduction of stress IEF on 3-day bladder diary and potential predictors at baseline for response to AMDC were assessed.
resultsFifty-eight participants were included in the study. Compared to baseline, the mean total and external sphincter volumes increased significantly in both groups (respectively, p = 0.001 and p < 0.001 in the AMDC group, p < 0.001 and p = 0.005 in the placebo group) at 12 months. Both groups showed a significant reduction of stress IEF compared to baseline (p = 0.03 and p ≤ 0.001 for AMDC and placebo groups, respectively). There were no between-group differences regarding total and external sphincter volumes and reduction of stress IEF. A longer urethral length (p ≤ 0.001) and a larger external sphincter volume (p ≤ 0.05) were significantly associated with lower stress IEF.
conclusionSignificant increases of sphincter volumes as well as reduction of stress IEF occurred among the AMDC and placebo injection groups with no between-group differences at 12 months. A longer urethral length and a larger external sphincter volume at baseline were identified as potential predictors of AMDC injection response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31938840What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.