ReviewJournal of exercise rehabilitation2019
The changes in cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines: from 2000 to the present.
Review in Journal of exercise rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of maternal positioning during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analyses.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Pooled it
- Rethinking the 2-minute rule in adult basic life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- The effects of cognitive-motor multitasking demands on the quality of chest compressions in CPR-A randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison Between the Advanced Cardiac Life Support and Adult Advanced Life Support Protocols: A Simulation-Based Pilot Study.Emergency medicine international · 2024Article
- Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation real-time audiovisual feedback devices improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of rescue Me CPR! smartphone app providing real-time guidance to untrained bystanders performing CPR.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Effect of the Brief Instructional Video Intervention on the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.International journal of medical sciences · 2023Article
- Outcomes Following In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in People Receiving Maintenance Dialysis.Kidney medicine · 2022Article
- Automated Condition-Based Suppression of the CPR Artifact in ECG Data to Make a Reliable Shock Decision for AEDs during CPR.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Analysis of the Way and Correctness of Using Automated External Defibrillators Placed in Public Space in Polish Cities-Continuation of Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Can a Glove-Coach Technology Significantly Increase the Efficacy of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Non-healthcare Professionals? A Controlled Trial.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to determine the changes made in the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines from 2000 to the present. The study was mainly undertaken by using International Guidelines from American Heart Association. The main change of CPR was chest compression skill. The guidelines have improved high-quality CPR through the change of chest compression skill. The latest adult CPR guidelines are as follows: (a) push chest quickly (100-120/min), (b) compress appropriately (5-6 cm), (c) relax chest fully (complete chest recoil), (d) avoid interruption of compression, and (e) avoid hyperventilation. The understanding of the latest CPR skills will be helpful in improving survival rate from sudden cardiac death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.