Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31938675›Full record

ArticleNMC case report journal2020

Delayed Complications Due to Polymer Coating Embolism after Endovascular Treatment.

Takayuki Kitamura, Hidenori Oishi, Takashi Fujii, Kohsuke Teranishi, Kenji Yatomi, Munetaka Yamamoto, Hajime Arai

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in NMC case report journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Histological appearance of topical hemostatic agents and materials in neuropathology.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Polytetrafluoroethylene coating fragments during neuroendovascular therapy: An analysis of two damaged microguidewires.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takayuki KitamuraDepartment of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidenori OishiDepartment of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi FujiiDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Kohsuke TeranishiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji YatomiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Munetaka YamamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hajime AraiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Juntendo University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have recently been reports of patients who developed postprocedural symptoms or alterations due to delayed foreign body embolisms observed in imaging findings. Polymer coating of devices have been described as a possible cause of foreign body embolisms, manifesting in delayed granulomatous responses and exhibiting characteristic imaging findings. In four of 4,025 patients who underwent coil embolization in our hospital or its affiliated facilities, similar findings were observed. Delayed lesions appeared between 1 month and 1 year after the procedures. There was extensive edema in the perfusion area of the treated vessels. In two cases examined by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, multiple solid enhancing lesions within vasogenic edema were observed. Biopsy revealed a membranous foreign body in a blood vessel with surrounding foreign body granuloma formation in 1 case. Because these findings are similar to those of cases reported previously, they were considered as a foreign body embolism due to coating separations from the devices. Polymer coating separation occurs most frequently from guidewires. Especially if a metal introducer is used, the risk of separation increases. Surgeons should carefully follow the manufacturers' instructions when they use these devices and should acknowledge and report any events that may occur. Although these complications are extremely rare, further studies are warranted of similar cases; and we should prepare and share information on these intravascular devices for wide-scale dissemination in the industry.

Indexed as

delayed complicationsendovascular treatmentforeign bodypolymer coating embolism

Identifiers

PMID31938675
PMCPMC6957771
OpenAlexW2995859055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.