Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31938672›Full record

ArticleArchives of scientific psychology2019

Empirical Failures of the Claim That Autistic People Lack a Theory of Mind.

Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Melanie Yergeau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of scientific psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Growing-up autistic: Sharing autistic children's experiences and insights.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Theory of Mind and Social Informant Discrepancy in Autism.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Challenging the Assumption That Autistic People Lack a Theory of Mind.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Morton Ann GernsbacherUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Melanie YergeauUniversity of Michigan.

Funding

Behavioral - Biological Training-Typical and Atypic(RMI)T32MH075880 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GERNSBACHER, MORTON ANN · 2005 to 2009
$809k
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH075880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The claim that autistic people lack a theory of mind-that they fail to understand that other people have a mind or that they themselves have a mind-pervades psychology. This article (a) reviews empirical evidence that fails to support the claim that autistic people are uniquely impaired, much less that all autistic people are universally impaired, on theory-of-mind tasks; (b) highlights original findings that have failed to replicate; (c) documents multiple instances in which the various theory-of-mind tasks fail to relate to each other and fail to account for autistic traits, social interaction, and empathy; (c) summarizes a large body of data, collected by researchers working outside the theory-of-mind rubric, that fails to support assertions made by researchers working inside the theory-of-mind rubric; and (d) concludes that the claim that autistic people lack a theory of mind is empirically questionable and societally harmful.

Indexed as

autismconvergent validitypredictive validityreproducibilitytheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID31938672
PMCPMC6959478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.