Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31938551›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

Feasibility of alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary health care in Kazakhstan: study protocol of a pilot cluster randomised trial.

Bernd Schulte, Amy O'Donnell, Harald Lahusen, Christina Lindemann, Mariya Prilutskaya, Oleg Yussopov, Zhanar Kaliyeva, Marcus-Sebastian Martens, Uwe Verthein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Substance Use and Misuse among Sexual and Gender Minority Communities Living in Former Soviet Union Countries: A Scoping Review.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bernd Schulte1Centre of Interdisciplinary Addiction Research of Hamburg University, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1139-030X
Amy O'Donnell2Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Harald Lahusen1Centre of Interdisciplinary Addiction Research of Hamburg University, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Christina Lindemann1Centre of Interdisciplinary Addiction Research of Hamburg University, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Mariya Prilutskaya3Pavlodar Branch of Semey State Medical University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.
Oleg YussopovMonitoring Center on Alcohol and Drugs, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.
Zhanar Kaliyeva5Sanjar Dzhafarovich Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Marcus-Sebastian Martens1Centre of Interdisciplinary Addiction Research of Hamburg University, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Uwe Verthein1Centre of Interdisciplinary Addiction Research of Hamburg University, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEKazakh National Medical University · KZNewcastle University · GBToraighyrov University · KZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying and addressing heavy drinking represents a major public health priority worldwide. Whilst the majority of alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) research has been conducted in western, high-income countries, evidence is growing that ASBI can also impact positively on heavy drinkers in low- and middle-income country populations. This mixed methods study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a fully randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of ASBI in primary care in Kazakhstan and explore the feasibility and acceptability of implementing ASBI in this setting from patients' and physicians' perspectives.

methodsSix primary health care units in the region of Pavlodar will be cluster randomised to either an intervention (WHO manualised 5 min alcohol brief intervention plus alcohol leaflet) or control group (simple feedback plus alcohol leaflet). Primary feasibility measures will be rates of participation at baseline and retention of eligible patients at the 3-month follow-up point. Patient/physician questionnaires and physician focus groups will assess additional dimensions of feasibility, as well as acceptability, according to the RE-AIM framework: Reach (rates of eligible patients screened/received advice); Effectiveness (change in AUDIT-C score); Adoption (rate/representativeness of participating physicians); Implementation (quality of ASBI/barriers and facilitators to delivery); and Maintenance (potential sustainability of intervention). DISCUSSION: This is the first trial of the feasibility and acceptability of ASBI in Kazakhstan. As the planning and assessment of implementation determinants is based on the RE-AIM framework, the project outcomes will be relevant for the future development, tailoring and implementation of ASBI in Kazakhstan.

trial registrationDRKS, DRKS00015882, Registered 17 December 2018.

Indexed as

AlcoholBrief interventionImplementation processesPrimary health careScreening

Identifiers

PMID31938551
PMCPMC6953225
OpenAlexW2998815110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.