Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31938518›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Opposite latitudinal patterns for bird and arthropod predation revealed in experiments with differently colored artificial prey.

Elena L Zvereva, Bastien Castagneyrol, Tatiana Cornelissen, Anders Forsman, Juan Antonio Hernández-Agüero, Tero Klemola, Lucas Paolucci, Vicente Polo, Norma Salinas, Kasselman Jurie Theron and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elena L ZverevaDepartment of Biology University of Turku Turku Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2934-3421
Bastien CastagneyrolBIOGECO INRA Univ. Bordeaux Cestas Cedex France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8795-7806
Tatiana CornelissenDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2721-7010
Anders ForsmanDepartment of Biology and Environmental Science Linnaeus University Kalmar Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9598-7618
Juan Antonio Hernández-AgüeroDepartment of Biology and Geology, Physics and Inorganic Chemistry University Rey Juan Carlos Móstoles Spain.
Tero KlemolaDepartment of Biology University of Turku Turku Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8510-329X
Lucas PaolucciSetor de Ecologia e Conservação Departamento de Biologia Universidade Federal de Lavras Lavras Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6403-5200
Vicente PoloDepartment of Biology and Geology, Physics and Inorganic Chemistry University Rey Juan Carlos Móstoles Spain.
Norma SalinasInstituto de Ciencias de la Naturaleza, Territorio y Energías Renovables Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú Lima Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-2109
Kasselman Jurie TheronDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-8720
Guorui XuCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Menglun China.
Vitali ZverevDepartment of Biology University of Turku Turku Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-9235
Mikhail V KozlovDepartment of Biology University of Turku Turku Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9500-4244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The strength of biotic interactions is generally thought to increase toward the equator, but support for this hypothesis is contradictory. We explored whether predator attacks on artificial prey of eight different colors vary among climates and whether this variation affects the detection of latitudinal patterns in predation. Bird attack rates negatively correlated with model luminance in cold and temperate environments, but not in tropical environments. Bird predation on black and on white (extremes in luminance) models demonstrated different latitudinal patterns, presumably due to differences in prey conspicuousness between habitats with different light regimes. When attacks on models of all colors were combined, arthropod predation decreased, whereas bird predation increased with increasing latitude. We conclude that selection for prey coloration may vary geographically and according to predator identity, and that the importance of different predators may show contrasting patterns, thus weakening the overall latitudinal trend in top-down control of herbivorous insects.

Indexed as

arthropod predatorsartificial preyavian predatorsbiotic interactionscolor preferencelatitudinal patternplasticine modelspredation rate

Identifiers

PMID31938518
PMCPMC6953658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.