ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2018
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of High Frequency Irreversible Electroporation for Canine Spontaneous Primary Lung Tumor Ablation.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) creates permanent pores in the cell membrane, leading to irreversible cell death. In this study, the impact of IRE on bronchial injury was comprehensively examined in a timed series study. Altogether, 8 Bama miniature pigs were included in this study and were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group underwent IRE that was guided and monitored by spiral computed tomography (CT). The monopole probe of the IRE was positioned at the right pulmonary hilum. Specimens were collected at 0 h, 2 h, 2 d, 7 d, and 14 d after the IRE procedure for a pathological examination. A small amount of needle-tract bleeding occurred in two animals, and mild pneumothorax occurred in another. IRE can elicit acute bronchial inflammation, bleeding, and mucosal injury, but severe complications were not found. Pathological examinations and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed dead vascular epithelium cells in the region of the ablation, while the bronchioli and the vascular extracellular matrix were preserved. At 2 hours post-IRE, there were marked increases in bronchoalveolar macrophages (P<0.001), but the inflammation could recover after 14 days and showed no statistical significance when compared with the control group at the same time. In conclusion, CT-guided IRE ablation can elicit acute but recoverable bronchial inflammation, bleeding, and mucosal injury in porcine lung tissues. However, longer follow-up is still required to establish an evaluation of the long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31938222PMC6958169W3027657148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.