Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31938067›Full record

ReviewTheranostics2020

EPR-mediated tumor targeting using ultrasmall-hybrid nanoparticles: From animal to human with theranostic AGuIX nanoparticles.

Guillaume Bort, François Lux, Sandrine Dufort, Yannick Crémillieux, Camille Verry, Olivier Tillement

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Theranostics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Golden era of radiosensitizers.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Lanthanide Nanotheranostics in Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Treatment Options for Brain Metastases.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guillaume BortUniv Lyon Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Institut Lumière Matière, Lyon, France.
François LuxUniv Lyon Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Institut Lumière Matière, Lyon, France.
Sandrine DufortNH TherAguix SA, Meylan, France.
Yannick CrémillieuxInstitut des Sciences Moléculaires, CNRS UMR 5255, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Camille VerryRadiotherapy department, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble cedex 9, France.
Olivier TillementUniv Lyon Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Institut Lumière Matière, Lyon, France.
Teem Photonics (France) · FRInstitut des Sciences Moléculaires · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest of tumor targeting through EPR effect is still controversial due to intrinsic low targeting efficacy and rare translation to human cancers. Moreover, due to different reasons, it has generally been described for relatively large nanoparticles (NPs) (hydrodynamic diameter > 10 nm). In this review EPR effect will be discussed for ultrasmall NPs using the example of the AGuIX® NP (Activation and Guiding of Irradiation by X-ray) recently translated in clinic. AGuIX® NP is a 4 ± 2 nm hydrodynamic diameter polysiloxane based NP. Since AGuIX® NP biodistribution is monitored by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its activation is triggered by irradiation upon X-rays, this NP is well adapted for a theranostic approach of radiotherapy cancer treatment. Here we show that AGuIX® NP is particularly well suited to benefit from EPR-mediated tumor targeting thanks to an ultrasmall size and efficacy under irradiation at small dose. Indeed, intravenously-injected AGuIX® NP into rodent cancer models passively reached the tumor and revealed no toxicity, favoured by renal clearance. Moreover, translation of AGuIX® NP accumulation and retention into humans carrying brain metastases was validated during a first-in-man phase Ib trial taking advantage of easy biodistribution monitoring by MRI.

Indexed as

GadoliniumNeoplasmsTheranostic NanomedicineAnimalsChelating AgentsHumansNanoparticlesParticle SizeSiloxanesTissue DistributionChelating AgentsGadoliniumSiloxanesAGuIXclinical translationEPR effecttheranosticultrasmall nanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID31938067
PMCPMC6956799
OpenAlexW3000296117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.