ReviewTheranostics2020
Imaging-assisted anticancer nanotherapy.
Review in Theranostics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- The multifaceted roles of the ACSL family in cancer: Metabolic reprogramming, ferroptosis regulation and tumour immune microenvironment remodelling.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Nanotherapeutic potential in glaucoma associated ocular cancers.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- PET Imaging Using 89Zr-Labeled StarPEG Nanocarriers Reveals Heterogeneous Enhanced Permeability and Retention in Prostate Cancer.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2025Article
- Assessing Therapeutic Nanoparticle Accumulation in Tumors Using Nanobubble-Based Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Emergence and impact of theranostic-nanoformulation of triple therapeutics for combination cancer therapy.Smart medicine · 2024Review
- New Opportunities and Old Challenges in the Clinical translation of Nanotheranostics.Nature reviews. Materials · 2023Article
- Review
- Approaches to Improve EPR-Based Drug Delivery for Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Foscarnet-Type Inorganic-Organic Hybrid Nanoparticles for Effective Antiviral Therapy.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2022Article
- Monitoring EPR Effect Dynamics during Nanotaxane Treatment with Theranostic Polymeric Micelles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Silica-Based Stimuli-Responsive Systems for Antitumor Drug Delivery and Controlled Release.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Engineered multifunctional nanocarriers for controlled drug delivery in tumor immunotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- LDL mediated delivery of Paclitaxel and MRI imaging probes for personalized medicine applications.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Article
- The past, present, and future of breast cancer models for nanomedicine development.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2021Review
- Stimuli-Responsive Iron Oxide Nanotheranostics: A Versatile and Powerful Approach for Cancer Therapy.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021Review
- Excretable, ultrasmall hexagonal NaGdFCancer nanotechnology · 2021Article
- Current update on nanoplatforms as therapeutic and diagnostic tools: A review for the materials used as nanotheranostics and imaging modalities.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2021Review
- Emerging methods in radiology.Der Radiologe · 2020Review
- Enhancing the Efficacy of CAR T Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment of Pancreatic Cancer.Cancers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer nanomedicines are submicrometer-sized formulations designed to improve the biodistribution of anticancer drugs, resulting in less off-target localization, altered toxicity profiles, improved target site accumulation and enhanced efficacy. Together, these beneficial features have resulted in the regulatory approval of about a dozen nanomedicines for the treatment of solid and hematological malignancies. In recent years, significant progress has been made in combining nanomedicines with imaging, to better understand key aspects of the tumor-targeted drug delivery process, and to address the high inter- and intra-individual heterogeneity in the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect. Strategies explored in this regard have included the use of traditional imaging techniques, companion diagnostics and nanotheranostics. Preclinically, integrating imaging in nanomedicine and drug delivery research has enabled the non-invasive and quantitative assessment of nanocarrier biodistribution, target site accumulation and (triggered) drug release. Clinically, imaging has been emerging as a promising tool for patient stratification, which is urgently needed to improve the translation of cancer nanomedicines. We here summarize recent progress in imaging-assisted anticancer nanotherapy and we discuss future strategies to improve the performance of cancer nanomedicines in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.