ArticleStatistica Sinica2019
Marginal screening for high-dimensional predictors of survival outcomes.
Article in Statistica Sinica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-selection inference for high-dimensional mediation analysis with survival outcomes.Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications · 2025Article
- EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF THE MAXIMAL ASSOCIATION BETWEEN MULTIPLE PREDICTORS AND A SURVIVAL OUTCOME.Annals of statistics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study develops a marginal screening test to detect the presence of significant predictors for a right-censored time-to-event outcome under a high-dimensional accelerated failure time (AFT) model. Establishing a rigorous screening test in this setting is challenging, because of the right censoring and the post-selection inference. In the latter case, an implicit variable selection step needs to be included to avoid inflating the Type-I error. A prior study solved this problem by constructing an adaptive resampling test under an ordinary linear regression. To accommodate right censoring, we develop a new approach based on a maximally selected Koul-Susarla-Van Ryzin estimator from a marginal AFT working model. A regularized bootstrap method is used to calibrate the test. Our test is more powerful and less conservative than both a Bonferroni correction of the marginal tests and other competing methods. The proposed method is evaluated in simulation studies and applied to two real data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.