Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937947›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2020

Ecology of the plastisphere.

Linda A Amaral-Zettler, Erik R Zettler, Tracy J Mincer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 232 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
232citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

232 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Tackling the global plastic pollution crisis.National science review · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative Genome Mining ofMarine drugs · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

172 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linda A Amaral-ZettlerNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, Den Burg, The Netherlands. linda.amaral-zettler@nioz.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0807-4744
Erik R ZettlerNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, Den Burg, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9266-1142
Tracy J MincerWilkes Honors College and Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4644-5609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plastisphere, which comprises the microbial community on plastic debris, rivals that of the built environment in spanning multiple biomes on Earth. Although human-derived debris has been entering the ocean for thousands of years, microplastics now numerically dominate marine debris and are primarily colonized by microbial and other microscopic life. The realization that this novel substrate in the marine environment can facilitate microbial dispersal and affect all aquatic ecosystems has intensified interest in the microbial ecology and evolution of this biotope. Whether a 'core' plastisphere community exists that is specific to plastic is currently a topic of intense investigation. This Review provides an overview of the microbial ecology of the plastisphere in the context of its diversity and function, as well as suggesting areas for further research.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPlasticsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEnvironmental PollutantsWaste ProductsEnvironmental PollutantsPlasticsWaste Products

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.