Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937923›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2020

Pre-operative cellular dissociation grading in biopsies is highly predictive of post-operative tumour stage and patient outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Moritz Jesinghaus, Katja Steiger, Fabian Stögbauer, Bernhard Haller, Andreas Kolk, Ulrich Straßen, Anja Pickhard, Markus Wirth, Miguel Silva, Jan Budczies and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prognostic Significance of Intratumoral and Peritumoral Budding in Distal Extrahepatic Bile Duct Carcinoma.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Tumour budding in solid cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Moritz JesinghausInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katja SteigerInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabian StögbauerInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard HallerInstitute for Epidemiology and Statistics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas KolkDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Ulrich StraßenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Anja PickhardDepartment of Otolaryngology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Markus WirthDepartment of Otolaryngology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Miguel SilvaGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Munich, Germany.
Jan BudcziesInstitute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Aaron Becker von RoseIII Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Björn KonukiewitzInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peer KuhnInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Konrad KlinghammerDepartment for Hematology and Oncology, Charite University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Hendrik DapperDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefan MünchDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stephanie E CombsDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wilko Weichert *Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Melanie Boxberg *Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. Melanie.Boxberg@tum.de.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-operative treatment planning in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is mainly dictated by clinical staging, which has major shortcomings. Histologic grading is irrelevant due to its lack of prognostic impact. Recently, a novel grading termed Cellular Dissociation Grade (CDG) based on Tumour Budding and Cell Nest Size was shown to be highly prognostic for resected HNSCC. We aimed to probe the predictive and prognostic impact of CDG in the pre-operative biopsies of HNSCC.

methodsWe evaluated CDG in n = 160 pre-therapeutic biopsies from patients who received standardised treatment following German guidelines, and correlated the results with pre- and post-therapeutic staging data and clinical outcome.

resultsPre-operative CDG was highly predictive of post-operative tumour stage, including the prediction of occult lymph node metastasis. Uni- and multivariate analysis revealed CDG to be an independent prognosticator of overall, disease-specific and disease-free survival (p < 0.001). Hazard ratio for disease-specific survival was 6.1 (11.1) for nG2 (nG3) compared with nG1 tumours.

conclusionsCDG is a strong outcome predictor in the pre-treatment scenario of HNSCC and identifies patients with nodal-negative disease. CDG is a purely histology-based prognosticator in the pre-therapeutic setting that supplements clinical staging and may aide therapeutic stratification of HNSCC patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31937923
PMCPMC7078181
OpenAlexW2999126022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.