ArticleScientific reports2020
Implementation of Complementary Model using Optimal Combination of Hematological Parameters for Sepsis Screening in Patients with Fever.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early detection of sepsis using machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Sepsis Using Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Impact of satellite blood culture on early diagnosis of sepsis.Journal of intensive medicine · 2022Article
- Applying artificial neural network for early detection of sepsis with intentionally preserved highly missing real-world data for simulating clinical situation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Early Detection of Sepsis With Machine Learning Techniques: A Brief Clinical Perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Survival prediction of patients with sepsis from age, sex, and septic episode number alone.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early detection and timely treatment are the most important factors for improving the outcome of patients with sepsis. Sepsis-related clinical score, such as SIRS, SOFA and LODS, were defined to identify patients with suspected infection and to predict severity and mortality. A few hematological parameters associated with organ dysfunction and infection were included in the score although various clinical pathology parameters (hematology, serum chemistry and plasma coagulation) in blood sample have been found to be associated with outcome in patients with sepsis. The investigation of the parameters facilitates the implementation of a complementary model for screening sepsis to existing sepsis clinical criteria and other laboratory signs. In this study, statistical analysis on the multiple clinical pathology parameters obtained from two groups, patients with sepsis and patients with fever, was performed and the complementary model was elaborated by stepwise parameter selection and machine learning. The complementary model showed statistically better performance (AUC 0.86 vs. 0.74-0.51) than models built up with specific hematology parameters involved in each existing sepsis-related clinical score. Our study presents the complementary model based on the optimal combination of hematological parameters for sepsis screening in patients with fever.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.