Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937825›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Implementation of Complementary Model using Optimal Combination of Hematological Parameters for Sepsis Screening in Patients with Fever.

Jang-Sik Choi, Tung X Trinh, Jihye Ha, Mi-Sook Yang, Yangsoon Lee, Yeoung-Eun Kim, Jungsoon Choi, Hyung-Gi Byun, Jaewoo Song, Tae-Hyun Yoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jang-Sik ChoiCenter for Next Generation Cytometry, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Tung X TrinhCenter for Next Generation Cytometry, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8961-2876
Jihye HaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Mi-Sook YangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Yangsoon LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Yeoung-Eun KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Jungsoon ChoiDepartment of Mathematics, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Hyung-Gi ByunDivision of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineering, Kangwon National University, Kangwon-Do, 25913, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3773-3294
Jaewoo SongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. labdx@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1877-5731
Tae-Hyun YoonCenter for Next Generation Cytometry, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea. taeyoon@hanyang.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2743-6360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early detection and timely treatment are the most important factors for improving the outcome of patients with sepsis. Sepsis-related clinical score, such as SIRS, SOFA and LODS, were defined to identify patients with suspected infection and to predict severity and mortality. A few hematological parameters associated with organ dysfunction and infection were included in the score although various clinical pathology parameters (hematology, serum chemistry and plasma coagulation) in blood sample have been found to be associated with outcome in patients with sepsis. The investigation of the parameters facilitates the implementation of a complementary model for screening sepsis to existing sepsis clinical criteria and other laboratory signs. In this study, statistical analysis on the multiple clinical pathology parameters obtained from two groups, patients with sepsis and patients with fever, was performed and the complementary model was elaborated by stepwise parameter selection and machine learning. The complementary model showed statistically better performance (AUC 0.86 vs. 0.74-0.51) than models built up with specific hematology parameters involved in each existing sepsis-related clinical score. Our study presents the complementary model based on the optimal combination of hematological parameters for sepsis screening in patients with fever.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalArea Under CurveBlood Chemical AnalysisBlood CoagulationCase-Control StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleFeverHumansMachine LearningMaleROC CurveSepsis

Identifiers

PMID31937825
PMCPMC6959355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.