Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937823›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Koala retrovirus viral load and disease burden in distinct northern and southern koala populations.

Nishat Sarker, Jessica Fabijan, Helen Owen, Jennifer Seddon, Greg Simmons, Natasha Speight, Jasmeet Kaler, Lucy Woolford, Richard David Emes, Farhid Hemmatzadeh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Koala retrovirus genetic diversity and transmission dynamics within captive koala populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular Diagnosis of Koala Retrovirus (KoRV) in South Australian Koalas (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nishat SarkerSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jessica FabijanSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Helen OwenSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jennifer SeddonSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3789-6878
Greg SimmonsSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Natasha SpeightSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-0241
Jasmeet KalerSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-7064
Lucy WoolfordSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Richard David EmesSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6855-5481
Farhid HemmatzadehSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Darren J TrottSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Joanne MeersSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. j.meers@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9305-0469
Rachael Eugenie TarlintonSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Rachael.Tarlinton@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-2311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Koala retrovirus (KoRV) displays features of both an endogenous and exogenous virus and is linked to neoplasia and immunosuppression in koalas. This study explores the apparent differences in the nature and impact of KoRV infection between geographically and genetically separated "northern" and "southern" koala populations, by investigating the disease status, completeness of the KoRV genome and the proviral (DNA) and viral (RNA) loads of 71 northern and 97 southern koalas. All northern animals were positive for all KoRV genes (gag, pro-pol and env) in both DNA and RNA forms, whereas many southern animals were missing one or more KoRV genes. There was a significant relationship between the completeness of the KoRV genome and clinical status in this population. The proviral and viral loads of the northern population were significantly higher than those of the southern population (P < 0.0001), and many provirus-positive southern animals failed to express any detectable KoRV RNA. Across both populations there was a positive association between proviral load and neoplasia (P = 0.009). Potential reasons for the differences in the nature of KoRV infection between the two populations are discussed.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsAustraliaDNAFemaleGene Products, envGene Products, gagGene Products, polMalePhascolarctidaeProvirusesRetroviridaeRetroviridae InfectionsRNA, ViralViral LoadDNAGene Products, envGene Products, gagGene Products, polRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID31937823
PMCPMC6959342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.