Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937801›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Complex marine bioturbation ecosystem engineering behaviors persisted in the wake of the end-Permian mass extinction.

Alison T Cribb, David J Bottjer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alison T CribbDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA. cribb@usc.edu.
David J BottjerDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The end-Permian mass extinction was the most severe mass extinction event of the Phanerozoic and was followed by a several million-year delay in benthic ecosystem recovery. While much work has been done to understand biotic recovery in both the body and trace fossil records of the Early Triassic, almost no focus has previously been given to analyzing patterns in ecosystem engineering complexity as a result of the extinction drivers. Bioturbation is a key ecosystem engineering behavior in marine environments, as it results in changes to resource flows and the physical environment. Thus, the trace fossil record can be used to examine the effect of the end-Permian mass extinction on bioturbating ecosystem engineers. We present a dataset compiled from previously published literature to analyze burrowing ecosystem engineering behaviors through the Permian-Triassic boundary. We report two key observations: first, that there is no loss in bioturbation ecosystem engineering behaviors after the mass extinction, and second, that these persisting behaviors include deep tier, high-impact, complex ecosystem engineering. These findings suggest that while environmental conditions may have limited deeper burrowing, complex ecosystem engineering behaviors were able to persist in the Early Triassic. Furthermore, the persistence of deep tier bioirrigated three-dimensional network burrows implies that benthic biogeochemical cycling could have been maintained at pre-extinction states in some local environments, stimulating ecosystem productivity and promoting biotic recovery in the Early Triassic.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiological EvolutionEcosystemExtinction, BiologicalPaleontologyAnimalsAquatic OrganismsFossilsPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID31937801
PMCPMC6959249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.