Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937549›Full record

ArticleGut2020

DNA damage signalling as an anti-cancer barrier in gastric intestinal metaplasia.

Vaidehi Krishnan, Debbie Xiu En Lim, Phuong Mai Hoang, Supriya Srivastava, Junichi Matsuo, Kie Kyon Huang, Feng Zhu, Khek Yu Ho, Jimmy Bok Yan So, Christopher Khor and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Gastric epithelium frombioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Bioengineered · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vaidehi KrishnanCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-5028-6567
Debbie Xiu En Lim *Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2772-0580
Phuong Mai Hoang *Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2772-0580
Supriya Srivastava *Department of Pathology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6727-3076
Junichi MatsuoCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2378-2370
Kie Kyon HuangProgram in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6727-3076
Feng ZhuDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6030-9251
Khek Yu HoDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2932-1962
Jimmy Bok Yan SoDepartment of Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9772-7905
Christopher KhorDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1409-5691
Stephen TsaoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9432-3382
Ming TehDepartment of Pathology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6879-8678
Kwong Ming FockDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2254-2260
Tiing Leong AngDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9993-8549
Anand D JeyasekharanCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9816-6137
Patrick TanProgram in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0179-8048
Khay-Guan YeohDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore csiitoy@nus.edu.sg mdcykg@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-7802-4606
Yoshiaki ItoCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore csiitoy@nus.edu.sg mdcykg@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-9037-1184
National University of Singapore · SGChangi General Hospital · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGTan Tock Seng Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIntestinal metaplasia (IM) is a premalignant stage that poses a greater risk for subsequent gastric cancer (GC). However, factors regulating IM to GC progression remain unclear. Previously, activated DNA damage response (DDR) signalling factors were shown to engage tumour-suppressive networks in premalignant lesions. Here, we interrogate the relationship of DDR signalling to mutational accumulation in IM lesions.

designIM biopsies were procured from the gastric cancer epidemiology programme, an endoscopic surveillance programme where biopsies have been subjected to (epi)genomic characterisation. IM samples were classified as genome-stable or genome-unstable based on their mutational burden/somatic copy-number alteration (CNA) profiles. Samples were probed for DDR signalling and cell proliferation, using the markers γH2AX and MCM2, respectively. The expression of the gastric stem cell marker, CD44v9, was also assessed. Tissue microarrays representing the GC progression spectrum were included.

resultsMCM2-positivity increased during GC progression, while γH2AX-positivity showed modest increase from normal to gastritis and IM stages, with further increase in GC. γH2AX levels correlated with the extent of chronic inflammation. Interestingly, genome-stable IM lesions had higher γH2AX levels underscoring a protective anti-cancer role for DDR signalling. In contrast, genome-unstable IM lesions with higher mutational burden/CNAs had lower γH2AX levels, elevated CD44v9 expression and modest promoter hypermethylation of DNA repair genes

conclusionsOur data suggest that IM lesions with active DDR will likely experience a longer latency at the premalignant state until additional hits that override DDR signalling clonally expand and promote progression. These observations provide insights on the factors governing IM progression.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsBiopsyDNA DamageDNA MethylationFemaleGastric MucosaGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistonesHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsMaleMetaplasiaMiddle AgedMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2MutationMutL Protein Homolog 1CD44v9 antigenH2AX protein, humanHistonesHyaluronan ReceptorsMCM2 protein, humanMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2MLH1 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1Rad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinRAD52 protein, humanWerner Syndrome HelicaseWRN protein, humanDNA damagegastric cancergastric metaplasia

Identifiers

PMID31937549
PMCPMC7497583
OpenAlexW2999210064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.