Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937369›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Comparative vector competence of North American Lyme disease vectors.

Lisa I Couper, Youyun Yang, Xiaofeng Frank Yang, Andrea Swei

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular-based laboratory testing confer accuracy over microscopical testing for tick identification.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Differential susceptibility of geographically distinctEmerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Grappling with the tick microbiome.Trends in parasitology · 2021
    Review
  13. Evolutionary Genetics ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Evolutionary ecology of Lyme Borrelia.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa I CouperDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Youyun YangDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Xiaofeng Frank YangDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Andrea SweiDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA. aswei@sfsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4475-4539
Indiana University School of MedicineSan Francisco State University · USStanford University · US

Funding

Regulatory Network of the Lyme Disease PathogenR01AI083640 · NIAID · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI X. Frank Yang · 2009 to 2026
$5.9M
National Science Foundation 1427772National Science Foundation 1745411National Science Foundation 175037NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI083640NIH HHS AI083640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the drivers of Lyme disease incidence at broad spatial scales is critical for predicting and mitigating human disease risk. Previous studies have identified vector phenology and behavior, host community composition, and landscape features as drivers of variable Lyme disease risk. However, while the Lyme disease transmission cycles in the eastern and western USA involve different vector species (Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes pacificus, respectively), the role of vector-specific differences in transmission efficiency has not been directly examined. By comparing the performance of traits involved in vector competence between these two species, this study aims to identify how vector competence contributes to variable Lyme disease risk.

methodsWe used a suite of laboratory experiments to compare the performance of traits related to vector competence for the two USA Lyme disease vectors. For each species, we measured the rate of attachment to a common rodent host, the engorgement weight, and the efficiency of pathogen acquisition (host to tick) and pathogen transmission (tick to host) from laboratory mice. In measuring pathogen acquisition and transmission, we used two different pathogen strains, one sympatric with I. scapularis and one sympatric with I. pacificus, to assess the importance of vector-pathogen coevolutionary history in transmission dynamics.

resultsWe found I. pacificus had significantly higher host attachment success and engorgement weights, but significantly lower pathogen transmission efficiency relative to I. scapularis. Molting success and pathogen acquisition did not differ between these two species. However, pathogen acquisition efficiency was significantly higher for both sympatric vector and pathogen strains than the allopatric pairings.

conclusionsThis study identified species-specific vector traits as a potential driver of broad scale variation in Lyme disease risk in the USA. In particular, the exceedingly low rates of pathogen transmission from tick to host observed for I. pacificus may limit Lyme disease transmission efficiency in the western USA. Further, observed variation in pathogen acquisition between sympatric and allopatric vector-pathogen strains indicate that vector-pathogen coevolutionary history may play a key role in transmission dynamics. These findings underscore the need to consider vector traits and vector-pathogen coevolution as important factors governing regional Lyme disease risk.

Indexed as

AnimalsArachnid VectorsHumansIncidenceIxodesLarvaLyme DiseaseMiceMice, Inbred C3HMoltingPeromyscusIxodes pacificusIxodes scapularisLyme diseasePathogen acquisitionPathogen transmissionVector competence

Identifiers

PMID31937369
PMCPMC6961398
OpenAlexW3011063830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.