Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937366›Full record

SynthesisParasites & vectors2020

Prevalence of Blastocystis sp. infection in several hosts in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Andernice Dos Santos Zanetti, Antonio Francisco Malheiros, Tatiane Amorim de Matos, Fabiana Gulin Longhi, Luciana Melhorança Moreira, Samuel Laudelino Silva, Solange Kimie Ikeda Castrillon, Silvana Margarida Benevides Ferreira, Eliane Ignotti, Omar Ariel Espinosa

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. ExploringJournal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Commensal, pathogen, or passenger? Rethinking the role ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  6. Molecular evidence ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2025
    Article
  7. The Role ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Foodborne concerns ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2024
    Review
  10. Molecular Prevalence and Subtypes Distribution ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Epidemiology of HumanTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Subtype distribution ofGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2022
    Review
  17. The Coexistence ofBiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. In vitro susceptibility of humanSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andernice Dos Santos ZanettiPost-Graduation Program in Environmental Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Antonio Francisco MalheirosPost-Graduation Program in Environmental Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Tatiane Amorim de MatosPost-Graduation Program in Environmental Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Fabiana Gulin LonghiThe Brazilian Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciana Melhorança MoreiraFaculty of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Samuel Laudelino SilvaFaculty of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Solange Kimie Ikeda CastrillonPost-Graduation Program in Environmental Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Silvana Margarida Benevides FerreiraThe Brazilian Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eliane IgnottiPost-Graduation Program in Environmental Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Omar Ariel EspinosaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil. oaetmpan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0912-9527
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlastocystis sp. affects a wide variety of animals and is the most common protozoan in human fecal samples with potential pandemic distribution. In the present study, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the prevalence and distribution of Blastocystis sp. in different classes of hosts in Brazil.

methodsStudies that analyzed hosts of various classes, including humans, domestic animals, wild animals or captive animals, were considered. The pooled prevalence of Blastocystis sp. infection was estimated by random effects models.

resultsFor humans, similar prevalence rates were found for males (31.0%, 95% CI: 17.0-45.0%; weight 10%) and females (28.0%, 95% CI: 16.0-41.0%; weight 10%); the state of Mato Grosso do Sul showed the highest prevalence, with 41.0% positivity (95% CI: 36.0-46.0%; weight 2.9%). The prevalence among immunocompromised patients was 5.0% (95% CI: 3.0-7.0%; weight 10%), and the most common cause of immunosuppression was hemodialysis, with 23.0% (95% CI: 17.0-29.0%; weight 12.4%). Among classifications according to interaction with humans, wild and domestic animals presented values of 19.0% (95% CI: 7.0-31.0%; weight 42.6%) and 17.0% (95% CI: 13.0-21.0%; weight 29.6%), respectively. Among these animals, mammals (39.0%, 95% CI: 21.0-56.0%; weight 47.3%) and birds (18.0%, 95% CI: 10.0-27.0%; weight 39.3%) exhibited the highest prevalence. Phylogenetic analysis of Blastocystis sp. revealed greater genetic diversity for clades of subtypes (STs) ST1, ST2 and ST3.

conclusionsThe overall prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in the Brazilian human population was 24%, which reflects the reality in the South, Southeast and Midwest regions, where prevalence rates of up to 40% were found. Among animals, mammals and birds exhibited the highest prevalence.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildAnimals, ZooBirdsBlastocystisBlastocystis InfectionsBrazilHumansImmunocompromised HostMammalsPhylogenyPrevalenceBlastocystisBlastocystis infectionBrazilMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31937366
PMCPMC6961275
OpenAlexW3007464644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.