Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937349›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2020

HIFI: estimating DNA-DNA interaction frequency from Hi-C data at restriction-fragment resolution.

Christopher Jf Cameron, Josée Dostie, Mathieu Blanchette

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. 3D genomic organization in cancers.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. 3D chromatin remodeling potentiates transcriptional programs driving cell invasion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Mapping nucleosome and chromatin architectures: A survey of computational methods.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher Jf CameronSchool of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Josée DostieDepartment of Biochemistry and Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. josee.dostie@mcgill.ca.
Mathieu BlanchetteSchool of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. blanchem@cs.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9555-860X

Funding

CIHR MOP-142451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hi-C is a popular technique to map three-dimensional chromosome conformation. In principle, Hi-C's resolution is only limited by the size of restriction fragments. However, insufficient sequencing depth forces researchers to artificially reduce the resolution of Hi-C matrices at a loss of biological interpretability. We present the Hi-C Interaction Frequency Inference (HIFI) algorithms that accurately estimate restriction-fragment resolution Hi-C matrices by exploiting dependencies between neighboring fragments. Cross-validation experiments and comparisons to 5C data and known regulatory interactions demonstrate HIFI's superiority to existing approaches. In addition, HIFI's restriction-fragment resolution reveals a new role for active regulatory regions in structuring topologically associating domains.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChromosomesGenomeRestriction MappingAnimalsDNAHumansMiceDNA5CChIA-PETChromosome conformation captureDensity estimationHi-CMarkov random fieldsubTADsTopologically associating domains

Identifiers

PMID31937349
PMCPMC6961295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.