Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937301›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

Evaluation of long-lasting indoor residual spraying of deltamethrin 62.5 SC-PE against malaria vectors in India.

Sudhansu Sekhar Sahu, Sonia Thankachy, Smrutidhara Dash, Krishnamoorthy Nallan, Subramanian Swaminathan, Gunasekaran Kasinathan, Jambulingam Purushothaman

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sudhansu Sekhar SahuIndian Council of Medical Research-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India. sssahu1961@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-049X
Sonia ThankachyIndian Council of Medical Research-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Smrutidhara DashIndian Council of Medical Research-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Krishnamoorthy NallanIndian Council of Medical Research-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Subramanian SwaminathanIndian Council of Medical Research-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Gunasekaran KasinathanIndian Council of Medical Research-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Jambulingam PurushothamanIndian Council of Medical Research-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Indian Council of Medical Research · IN

Funding

Bayer CropScience 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeltamethrin 62.5 polymer-enhanced suspension concentrate (SC-PE) is one of the World Health Organization-approved insecticides for indoor residual spraying and was recommended to evaluate its residual activity for determination of appropriate spray cycles in different eco-epidemiologic settings. In the current study, efficacy of deltamethrin 62.5 SC-PE was evaluated against vectors of malaria and its impact on malaria incidence in a Plasmodium falciparum hyper-endemic area in Koraput district, Odisha State, India.

methodsThe trial had two comparable arms, arm 1 with residual spraying of deltamethrin 62.5 SC-PE and arm 2 with deltamethrin 2.5% WP (positive control). Comparative assessment of the impact of each intervention arm on entomological (density, parity, infection and human blood index), epidemiological (malaria incidence) parameters, residual efficacy and adverse effects were evaluated.

resultsBoth the arms were comparable in terms of entomological and epidemiological parameters. While, deltamethrin 62.5 SC-PE was found to be effective for 150 days in mud and wood surfaces and 157 days in cement surfaces; deltamethrin 2.5% was effective only for 105 days on mud surfaces and 113 days on cement and wood surfaces.

conclusionsDeltamethrin 62.5 SC-PE had prolonged killing effectiveness up to 5 months. Hence, one round of IRS with deltamethrin 62.5 SC-PE would be sufficient to cover two existing malaria peak transmission seasons (July-August and October-November) in many parts of India.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesInsect VectorsNitrilesPesticide ResiduesPyrethrinsAdultAerosolsAnimalsCluster AnalysisEndemic DiseasesFemaleHousingHumansIncidenceIndiaAerosolsdecamethrinInsecticidesNitrilesPesticide ResiduesPyrethrinsSuspensionsAnopheles culicifaciesAnopheles fluviatilisDeltamethrin 62.5 SC-PEIndiaIndoor residual spraying

Identifiers

PMID31937301
PMCPMC6961237
OpenAlexW3012923215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.