Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937255›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Automatic construction of metabolic models with enzyme constraints.

Pavlos Stephanos Bekiaris, Steffen Klamt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Advances in Machine Learning Models for Predicting Enzyme Kinetic Parameters.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Metabolic modeling of host-microbe interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pavlos Stephanos BekiarisMax Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Sandtorstr. 1, Magdeburg, Germany.
Steffen KlamtMax Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Sandtorstr. 1, Magdeburg, Germany. klamt@mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2563-7561

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 031B0524BBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 031L0104BEuropean Research Council 721176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to improve the accuracy of constraint-based metabolic models, several approaches have been developed which intend to integrate additional biological information. Two of these methods, MOMENT and GECKO, incorporate enzymatic (kcat) parameters and enzyme mass constraints to further constrain the space of feasible metabolic flux distributions. While both methods have been proven to deliver useful extensions of metabolic models, they may considerably increase size and complexity of the models and there is currently no tool available to fully automate generation and calibration of such enzyme-constrained models from given stoichiometric models.

resultsIn this work we present three major developments. We first conceived short MOMENT (sMOMENT), a simplified version of the MOMENT approach, which yields the same predictions as MOMENT but requires significantly fewer variables and enables direct inclusion of the relevant enzyme constraints in the standard representation of a constraint-based model. When measurements of enzyme concentrations are available, these can be included as well leading in the extreme case, where all enzyme concentrations are known, to a model representation that is analogous to the GECKO approach. Second, we developed the AutoPACMEN toolbox which allows an almost fully automated creation of sMOMENT-enhanced stoichiometric metabolic models. In particular, this includes the automatic read-out and processing of relevant enzymatic data from different databases and the reconfiguration of the stoichiometric model with embedded enzymatic constraints. Additionally, tools have been developed to adjust (kcat and enzyme pool) parameters of sMOMENT models based on given flux data. We finally applied the new sMOMENT approach and the AutoPACMEN toolbox to generate an enzyme-constrained version of the E. coli genome-scale model iJO1366 and analyze its key properties and differences with the standard model. In particular, we show that the enzyme constraints improve flux predictions (e.g., explaining overflow metabolism and other metabolic switches) and demonstrate, for the first time, that these constraints can markedly change the spectrum of metabolic engineering strategies for different target products.

conclusionsThe methodological and tool developments presented herein pave the way for a simplified and routine construction and analysis of enzyme-constrained metabolic models.

Indexed as

AutomationEnzymesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGenome, BacterialMetabolic EngineeringMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalEnzymesEscherichia coli ProteinsEnzyme constraintsEscherichia coliFlux balance analysisMetabolic modelingMinimal cut setsProtein allocationProteomics

Identifiers

PMID31937255
PMCPMC6961255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.