ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020
The ecology of human-nature interactions.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of EEG, fMRI, and fNIRS Studies on the Psychological Impact of Nature on Well-Being.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Multidimensional urban morphology and carbon intensity: Nonlinear drivers in dense cities.iScience · 2026Article
- Ecosystem structure influences human health outcomes as the basis for green prescriptions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Has the establishment of national parks improved nature-based tourism experiences? Evidence from social media data.PloS one · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic and ecological drivers of snakebite incidence in Mexico: A spatial analysis of risk factors.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Causal and Predictive Data Analysis for Conservation: Simulation Based Comparisons and a Case Study for Detecting Impact of Artificial Feeding on Eurasian Red Squirrel (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- The impact of blue-green spatial landscape pattern on population distribution pattern in Chinese cities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cultural integration of invasive species.npj biodiversity · 2025Review
- Conserving the beauty of the world's reef fish assemblages.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Feathers, folklore, and eco-literacy: Stories ascribe cultural keystone status to avian scavengers in South Asian cities.Ornithological applications · 2025Article
- Feeding Habits of Leopards and Leopard Cats in the Fragmented Forests Surrounding the Kathmandu Valley.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Eco-fertility: examining the climate change-total fertility rate nexus in the context of sustainable developmental goals in a systematic review approach.Medical review (2021) · 2025Review
- Design and management considerations for the Kenya-Tanzania marine transboundary conservation area.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Review
- Community science as a potential tool to monitor animal demography and human-animal interactions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nature's impact on human health and wellbeing: the scale matters.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Realities of using self-administered smartphone surveys to solve sustainability challenges.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The direct interactions between people and nature are critically important in many ways, with growing attention particularly on their impacts on human health and wellbeing (both positive and negative), on people's attitudes and behaviour towards nature, and on the benefits and hazards to wildlife. A growing evidence base is accelerating the understanding of different forms that these direct human-nature interactions take, novel analyses are revealing the importance of the opportunity and orientation of individual people as key drivers of these interactions, and methodological developments are increasingly making apparent their spatial, temporal and socio-economic dynamics. Here, we provide a roadmap of these advances and identify key, often interdisciplinary, research challenges that remain to be met. We identified several key challenges, including the need to characterize individual people's nature interactions through their life course, to determine in a comparable fashion how these interactions vary across much more diverse geographical, cultural and socio-economic contexts that have been explored to date, and to quantify how the relative contributions of people's opportunity and orientation vary in shaping their nature interactions. A robust research effort, guided by a focus on such unanswered questions, has the potential to yield high-impact insights into the fundamental nature of human-nature interactions and contribute to developing strategies for their appropriate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.