Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937184›Full record

SynthesisHealth psychology review2021

Using discrete choice experiments to develop and deliver patient-centered psychological interventions: a systematic review.

Meghan E McGrady, Ahna L H Pai, Lisa A Prosser

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health psychology review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05449561 (Beyond Efficacy- Eliciting Preference for Face-to-face and Internet-based Psychotherapy Among People with Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05449561 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Beyond Efficacy- Eliciting Preference for Face-to-face and Internet-based Psychotherapy Among People with Depression: Using Discrete Choice Experiment to Advance Future Service Implementation

TypeobservationalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsDepression
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Paramedic perspectives on workplace peer support: a thematic analysis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. BMJ open · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What do justice-involved youth want from integrated youth services? A conjoint analysis.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meghan E McGradyDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Patient and Family Wellness Center, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Ahna L H PaiDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Patient and Family Wellness Center, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Lisa A ProsserDepartment of Pediatrics, Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Patient Preferences and Adherence in Adolescents and Young Adults with CancerK07CA200668 · NCI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MCGRADY, MEGHAN EILEEN · 2016 to 2020
$724k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA200668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing and/or tailoring psychological interventions to align with patient preferences is a critical component of patient-centered care and has the potential to improve patient engagement and treatment outcomes. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are a quantitative method of assessing patient preferences that offer numerous strengths (i.e., ability to account for trade-offs), but are not routinely incorporated into health psychology coursework, likely leaving many unaware of the potential benefits of this methodology. To highlight the potential applications of DCEs within health psychology, this systematic review synthesises previous efforts to utilise DCEs to inform the design of patient-centered psychological care, defined as interventions targeting psychological (e.g., depression, anxiety) or behavioural health (e.g., pain management, adherence) concerns. Literature searches were conducted in March 2017 and November 2019 for articles reporting on DCEs using the terms 'discrete choice', 'conjoint', or 'stated preference'. Thirty-nine articles met all inclusion criteria and used DCEs to understand patient preferences regarding psychosocial clinical services (

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePatient PreferenceDelivery of Health CareHumansResearch Designbehavioural interventiondiscrete choice experimentPsychological intervention

Identifiers

PMID31937184
PMCPMC7373669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.