Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937081›Full record

ReviewClinical and molecular hepatology2020

Switching to systemic therapy after locoregional treatment failure: Definition and best timing.

Sadahisa Ogasawara, Yoshihiko Ooka, Keisuke Koroki, Susumu Maruta, Hiroaki Kanzaki, Kengo Kanayama, Kazufumi Kobayashi, Soichiro Kiyono, Masato Nakamura, Naoya Kanogawa and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sadahisa OgasawaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshihiko OokaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Keisuke KorokiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Susumu MarutaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroaki KanzakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Kengo KanayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Kazufumi KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Soichiro KiyonoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Masato NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Naoya KanogawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Tomoko SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Takayuki KondoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Eiichiro SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Shingo NakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Akinobu TawadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Tetsuhiro ChibaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Makoto AraiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Jun KatoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Naoya KatoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Chiba University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without both macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis, the initial treatment choice recommended is transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Before sorafenib came into wide use, TACE had been pointlessly carried out repeatedly. It was in the early 2010s that the concept of TACE refractory was advocated. Two retrospective studies from Japan indicated that conversion from TACE to sorafenib the day after patients were deemed as TACE refractory improved overall survival compared with continued TACE, according to the definition by the Japan Society of Hepatology. Nowadays, phase 3 trials have shown clinical benefits of several novel molecular target agents. Compared with the era of sorafenib, sequential treatments with these molecular target agents have gradually prolonged patients' survival and have become major strategies in patients with HCC. Taking these together, conversion from TACE to systemic therapies at the time of TACE refractory, compared with before, may have a greater impact on survival and may be considered deeper in the decisions-making process in patients with unresectable HCC who are candidate for TACE. Up-to-date information on the concept of TACE refractory is summarized in this review. We believe that the survival of patients with unresectable HCC without both macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis may be dramatically improved by optimal timing of TACE refractory and switching to systemic therapies.

Indexed as

Treatment SwitchingAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticHumansLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasm MetastasisSorafenibTreatment FailureAntineoplastic AgentsSorafenibCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver neoplasmsPatient selectionSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID31937081
PMCPMC7160341
OpenAlexW3000185623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.