Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31936897›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Evaluation of Calcium Electroporation for the Treatment of Cutaneous Metastases: A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Phase II Trial.

Dóra Ágoston, Eszter Baltás, Henriette Ócsai, Sándor Rátkai, Péter Gy Lázár, Irma Korom, Erika Varga, István Balázs Németh, Éva Dósa-Rácz Viharosné, Julie Gehl and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03628417 (Fázis II, randomizált, kettős Vak vizsgálat a bőr metasztázisok kezelésére kálcium elektroporációval), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03628417 nacompletednot on this map

Fázis II, randomizált, kettős Vak vizsgálat a bőr metasztázisok kezelésére kálcium elektroporációval

TypeinterventionalSponsorSzeged UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled7ConditionsCutaneous MelanomaArmsCalcium Electroporation, Bleomycin based electrochemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CaUltrasonics sonochemistry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Reversible electroporation for cancer therapy.The British journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dóra ÁgostonDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Eszter BaltásDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Henriette ÓcsaiDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Sándor RátkaiDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Péter Gy LázárDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Irma KoromDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Erika VargaDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
István Balázs NémethDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Éva Dósa-Rácz ViharosnéDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Julie GehlCenter for Experimental Drug and Gene Electrotransfer (C*EDGE), Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Judit OláhDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Lajos KeményDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Erika Gabriella KisDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
University of Szeged · HUUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium electroporation (Ca-EP) is a new anticancer treatment providing similar features to electrochemotherapy (ECT). The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of Ca-EP with bleomycin-based ECT. This double-blinded randomized controlled phase II study was conducted at the Medical University of Szeged, Hungary. During this once only treatment up to ten measurable cutaneous metastases per patient were separately block randomized for intratumoral delivery of either calcium or bleomycin, which was followed by reversible electroporation. Tumour response was evaluated clinically and histologically six months after treatment. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03628417, closed). Seven patients with 44 metastases (34 from malignant melanoma, 10 from breast cancer) were included in the study. Eleven metastases were taken for biopsies, and 33 metastases were randomised and treated once. The objective response rates were 33% (6/18) for Ca-EP and 53% (8/15) for bleomycin-based ECT, with 22% (4/18) and 40% (6/15) complete response rates, respectively. The CR was confirmed histologically in both arms. Serious adverse events were not registered. Ulceration and hyperpigmentation, both CTCA criteria grade I side effects, were observed more frequently after bleomycin-based ECT than for Ca-EP. Ca-EP was non-inferior to ECT, therefore, it should be considered as a feasible, effective and safe treatment option.

Indexed as

biopsybleomycin-based electrochemotherapybreast cancercalcium electroporationcutaneous metastasesmelanoma malignumnon-inferiorityrandomization

Identifiers

PMID31936897
PMCPMC7017133
OpenAlexW3000289757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.