Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31936707›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Cell Cycle and DNA Repair Regulation in the Damage Response: Protein Phosphatases Take Over the Reins.

Adrián Campos, Andrés Clemente-Blanco

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An update of predictive biomarkers related to WEE1 inhibition in cancer therapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. IncRNA-ZFAS1, an Emerging Gate-Keeper in DNA Damage-Dependent Transcriptional Regulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrián CamposInstituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica (IBFG). Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) and Universidad de Salamanca (USAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Andrés Clemente-BlancoInstituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica (IBFG). Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) and Universidad de Salamanca (USAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3674-0671
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

Consejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León CLU-2017-03Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PGC2018-097963-B-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells are constantly suffering genotoxic stresses that affect the integrity of our genetic material. Genotoxic insults must be repaired to avoid the loss or inappropriate transmission of the genetic information, a situation that could lead to the appearance of developmental abnormalities and tumorigenesis. To combat this threat, eukaryotic cells have evolved a set of sophisticated molecular mechanisms that are collectively known as the DNA damage response (DDR). This surveillance system controls several aspects of the cellular response, including the detection of lesions, a temporary cell cycle arrest, and the repair of the broken DNA. While the regulation of the DDR by numerous kinases has been well documented over the last decade, the complex roles of protein dephosphorylation have only recently begun to be investigated. Here, we review recent progress in the characterization of DDR-related protein phosphatases during the response to a DNA lesion, focusing mainly on their ability to modulate the DNA damage checkpoint and the repair of the damaged DNA. We also discuss their protein composition and structure, target specificity, and biochemical regulation along the different stages encompassed in the DDR. The compilation of this information will allow us to better comprehend the physiological significance of protein dephosphorylation in the maintenance of genome integrity and cell viability in response to genotoxic stress.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansNuclear ProteinsPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesProtein Phosphatase 1Protein Phosphatase 2Protein Phosphatase 2CProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesCell Cycle ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesPPM1D protein, humanProtein Phosphatase 1Protein Phosphatase 2Protein Phosphatase 2Cprotein phosphatase 4protein phosphatase 5Protein Tyrosine Phosphatasescell cyclecheckpoint recoveryDNA damage checkpointDNA repairphosphatases

Identifiers

PMID31936707
PMCPMC7014277
OpenAlexW3000550156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.