Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31936477›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Health Professionals' Counseling about Electronic Cigarettes for Smokers and Vapers in a Country That Bans the Sales and Marketing of Electronic Cigarettes.

Katia Gallegos-Carrillo, Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez, Edna Arillo-Santillán, Luis Zavala-Arciniega, Yoo Jin Cho, James F Thrasher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Salud publica de Mexico · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Katia Gallegos-CarrilloEpidemiology and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62000, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6056-8587
Inti Barrientos-GutiérrezEvaluation and Surveys Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62100, Mexico.
Edna Arillo-SantillánTobacco Research Department, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62100, Mexico.
Luis Zavala-ArciniegaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Yoo Jin ChoDepartment of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9590-9206
James F ThrasherTobacco Research Department, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62100, Mexico.
University of South Carolina · USAustralian National University · AUInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MXUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Electronic cigarettes in Latin America: Evaluation of impacts and policy optionsR01TW010652 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BARNOYA, JOAQUIN, THRASHER, JAMES · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes the prevalence and correlates of adult smokers' discussions about electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) with health professionals (HPs), including whether these discussions may lead smokers and vapers to use e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.

methodsWe analyzed data from an online survey of Mexican smokers recruited from a consumer panel for marketing research. Participants who had visited an HP in the prior four months (

resultsSmokers who also used e-cigarettes (i.e., dual users) were more likely than exclusive smokers to have discussed e-cigarettes with their HP (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.96; 95% C.I. 2.73, 5.74), as were those who had recently attempted to quit smoking (AOR = 1.89; 95% C.I. 1.33, 2.7). Of smokers who had discussed e-cigarettes, 53.3% reported that the discussion led them to use e-cigarettes in their quit attempt. Also, dual users (AOR = 2.6; 95% C.I. 1.5, 4.5) and daily smokers (>5 cigarettes per day) (AOR = 3.62; 95% C.I. 1.9, 6.8) were more likely to report being led by their HP to use e-cigarettes in the quit attempt compared to exclusive smokers and non-daily smokers, respectively.

conclusionsDiscussions between HP and smokers about e-cigarettes were relatively common in Mexico, where e-cigarettes are banned. These discussions appear driven by the use of e-cigarettes, as well as by greater smoking frequency and intentions to quit smoking.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelAdultCounselingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMaleMarketingMiddle AgedSmokersSmokingSmoking CessationSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco ProductsTobacco SmokingTobacco Usee-cigarettesprimary health carepublic healthsmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID31936477
PMCPMC7013470
OpenAlexW2999111579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.