Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31936370›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Occupational Determinants of Leptospirosis among Urban Service Workers.

Azman Atil, Mohammad Saffree Jeffree, Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul Rahim, Mohd Rohaizat Hassan, Khamisah Awang Lukman, Kamruddin Ahmed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A severe case of sepsis and pneumonia caused byOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Are PathogenicTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Leptospirosis Risk among Occupational Groups in Brazil, 2010-2015.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Leptospirosis and Coinfection: Should We Be Concerned?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  12. Existence of SimilarPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Azman AtilDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia.
Mohammad Saffree JeffreeDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia.
Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul RahimDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia.
Mohd Rohaizat HassanDepartment of Community Health, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Khamisah Awang LukmanDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia.
Kamruddin AhmedBorneo Medical and Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Sabah, Malaysia.
Universiti of Malaysia Sabah · MYUniversity Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the risk factors of leptospirosis infection among local urban service workers in Sabah. This is a cross-sectional study involving 394 workers in Kota Kinabalu City, Sabah, conducted from February to March 2017. Information on demography, occupational exposures and environmental factors was obtained by a modified validated questionnaire. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was used to determine the prevalence of positive leptospirae. The overall figure for positive leptospirae was 9.4% (95% CI: 6.8-12.8). Urban sweepers and lorry drivers made up the highest proportion of positive leptospirae respondents, contributing 15.5% and 9.4%, respectively. The significant risk factors for positive leptospirae were older age (

Indexed as

AdultBiological MonitoringCitiesCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, BacterialEmploymentFemaleHumansLeptospiraLeptospirosisMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, Bacterialleptospirosisoccupational determinantsurban servicesworkers

Identifiers

PMID31936370
PMCPMC7013697
OpenAlexW2998753378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.