Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31936349›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Protecting Children from Toxic Waste: Data-Usability Evaluation Can Deter Flawed Cleanup.

K S Shrader-Frechette, A M Biondo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Does Hazardous-Waste Testing Follow Technical Guidance, Thus Help Protect Environmental Justice and Health?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Health Misinformation about Toxic-Site Harm: The Case for Independent-Party Testing to Confirm Safety.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K S Shrader-FrechetteDepartment of Biological Sciences, 100 Malloy Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
A M BiondoDepartment of Economics, 3060 Jenkins Nanovic Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
University of Notre Dame · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly 25 percent of US children live within 2 km of toxic-waste sites, most of which are in urban areas. They face higher rates of cancer than adults, partly because the dominant contaminants at most US hazardous-waste sites include genotoxic carcinogens, like trichloroethylene, that are much more harmful to children. The

Indexed as

Child HealthEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationHazardous Waste SitesCaliforniaChildHazardous WasteHumansPublic HealthRisk AssessmentHazardous WasteCaliforniachildrendata-usability evaluation (DUE)environmental justiceNinyo and MoorePasadenaperchloroethylene (PCE)remediationtoxic wasteTrammell Crowtrichloroethylene (TCE)

Identifiers

PMID31936349
PMCPMC7014154
OpenAlexW3000495997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.