Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31936272›Full record

ArticleCells2020

Fibronectin and Periostin as Prognostic Markers in Ovarian Cancer.

Katarzyna Aleksandra Kujawa, Ewa Zembala-Nożyńska, Alexander Jorge Cortez, Tomasz Kujawa, Jolanta Kupryjańczyk, Katarzyna Marta Lisowska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genetic Variations in the Fibronectin 1 Gene (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Serum fibronectin levels in malignant and benign endometrial diseases.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Theranostics · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Prognostic Impact of the Angiogenic GeneFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katarzyna Aleksandra KujawaCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer; Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Ewa Zembala-NożyńskaTumor Pathology Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Alexander Jorge CortezCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer; Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1284-2638
Tomasz KujawaData Mining Division, Faculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Jolanta KupryjańczykDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5820-0214
Katarzyna Marta LisowskaCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer; Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9786-3993
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLSilesian University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, based on a DNA microarray experiment, we identified a 96-gene prognostic signature associated with the shorter survival of ovarian cancer patients. We hypothesized that some differentially expressed protein-coding genes from this signature could potentially serve as prognostic markers. The present study was aimed to validate two proteins, namely fibronectin (FN1) and periostin (POSTN), in the independent set of ovarian cancer samples. Both proteins are mainly known as extracellular matrix proteins with many important functions in physiology. However, there are also indications that they are implicated in cancer, including ovarian cancer. The expression of these proteins was immunohistochemically analyzed in 108 surgical samples of advanced ovarian cancer (majority: high-grade serous) and additionally on tissue arrays representing different stages of the progression of ovarian and fallopian tube epithelial tumors, from normal epithelia, through benign tumors, to adenocarcinomas of different stages. The correlation with clinical, pathological, and molecular features was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox-proportional hazards models were used to estimate the correlation of the expression levels these proteins with survival. We observed that the higher expression of fibronectin in the tumor stroma was highly associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesCystadenocarcinoma, SerousEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFibronectinsFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesFibronectinsFN1 protein, humanPOSTN protein, humanfibronectinhigh-grade serous ovarian cancerimmunohistochemistryperiostinprognostic biomarkerstumor stroma

Identifiers

PMID31936272
PMCPMC7016975
OpenAlexW2999805220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.