Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31936002›Full record

ArticleBiology2020

A Model In Vitro Study Using Hypericin: Tumor-Versus Necrosis-Targeting Property and Possible Mechanisms.

Yue Li, Shuncong Wang, Yuanyu Zhao, Hexige Saiyin, Xiaoyan He, Juanzhi Zhao, Ling Li, Ali Talebi, Gang Huang, Yicheng Ni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hyaluronic acid-modified polymeric nanoplatform deliveringJournal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Towards updated understanding of brain metastasis.American journal of cancer research · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yue LiShanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China.
Shuncong WangKU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Faculty of Medicine, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Yuanyu ZhaoTechnology Center of Chongqing Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Chongqing 401147, China.
Hexige SaiyinState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Xiaoyan HeShanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China.
Juanzhi ZhaoLaboratory of Translational Medicine, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China.
Ling LiLaboratory of Translational Medicine, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China.
Ali TalebiKU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Faculty of Medicine, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Gang HuangShanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China.
Yicheng NiKU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Faculty of Medicine, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNKU Leuven · BEShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81603142;81830052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypericin (Hyp) had been explored as a tumor-seeking agent for years; however, more recent studies showed its necrosis-avidity rather than cancer-seeking property. To further look into this discrepancy, we conducted an in vitro study on Hyp retention in vital and dead cancerous HepG2 and normal LO2 cell lines by measuring the fluorescence intensity and concentration of Hyp in cells. To question the DNA binding theory for its necrosis-avidity, the subcellular distribution of Hyp was also investigated to explore the possible mechanisms of the necrosis avidity. The fluorescence intensity and concentration are significantly higher in dead cells than those in vital cells, and this difference did not differ between HepG2 and LO2 cell lines. Hyp was taken up in vital cells in the early phase and excreted within hours, whereas it was retained in dead cells for more than two days. Confocal microscopy showed that Hyp selectively accumulated in lysosomes rather than cell membrane or nuclei. Hyp showed a necrosis-avid property rather than cancer-targetability. The long-lasting retention of Hyp in dead cells may be associated with halted energy metabolism and/or binding with certain degraded cellular substrates. Necrosis-avidity of Hyp was confirmed, which may be associated with halted energy metabolism in dead LO2 or HepG2 cells.

Indexed as

confocal microscopy and mechanismfluorescencehypericinliver cancernecrosis-avidity

Identifiers

PMID31936002
PMCPMC7168897
OpenAlexW3000236307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.