ArticleNutrients2020
Correction: Alexandre-Gouabau et al. "Comprehensive Preterm Breast Milk Metabotype Associated with Optimal Infant Early Growth Pattern",
Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast milk protein content at week 3 after birth and neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants fed fortified breast milk.European journal of nutrition · 2021Observational
- The Metabolomic Analysis of Human Milk Offers Unique Insights into Potential Child Health Benefits.Current nutrition reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The authors wish to make a correction to Section 2 [...].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.