Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31935852›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2020

Ergodic Subspace Analysis.

Timo von Oertzen, Florian Schmiedek, Manuel C Voelkle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. What ergodicity means for you.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timo von OertzenDepartment of Psychology, University of the Federal Forces Munich, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany.
Florian SchmiedekDIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Manuel C VoelkleDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5576-8103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Properties of psychological variables at the mean or variance level can differ between persons and within persons across multiple time points. For example, cross-sectional findings between persons of different ages do not necessarily reflect the development of a single person over time. Recently, there has been an increased interest in the difference between covariance structures, expressed by covariance matrices, that evolve between persons and within a single person over multiple time points. If these structures are identical at the population level, the structure is called ergodic. However, recent data confirms that ergodicity is not generally given, particularly not for cognitive variables. For example, the

Indexed as

cognitiondimension reductionergodicityergodic subspace analysis

Identifiers

PMID31935852
PMCPMC7151196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.