Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31935266›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Disease-specific out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in urban Bangladesh: A Bayesian analysis.

Md Mahfuzur Rahman, Cherri Zhang, Khin Thet Swe, Md Shafiur Rahman, Md Rashedul Islam, Md Kamrujjaman, Papia Sultana, Md Zakiul Hassan, Md Shahinul Alam, Md Mizanur Rahman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Md Mahfuzur RahmanGlobal Public Health Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1018-8732
Cherri ZhangGlobal Public Health Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-4922
Khin Thet SweDepartment of Global Health Policy, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3926-7135
Md Shafiur RahmanGlobal Public Health Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Rashedul IslamGlobal Public Health Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md KamrujjamanDepartment of Mathematics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-4892-745X
Papia SultanaDepartment of Statistics, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.
Md Zakiul Hassanicddr,b, (Formerly, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research Bangladesh) Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-5888-1558
Md Shahinul AlamBangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Mizanur RahmanGlobal Public Health Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Child Health Research Foundation · BDBangladesh Medical University · BDUniversity of Dhaka · BDInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause of the rapid increase of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and high burden of healthcare-related financial issues in Bangladesh, there is a concern that out-of-pocket (OOP) payments related to illnesses may become a major burden on household. It is crucial to understand what are the major illnesses responsible for high OPP at the household level to help policymakers prioritize key areas of actions to protect the household from 100% financial hardship for seeking health care as part of universal health coverage.

objectivesWe first estimated the costs of illnesses among a population in urban Bangladesh, and then assessed the household financial burden associated with these illnesses.

methodA cross-sectional survey of 1593 randomly selected households was carried out in Bangladesh (urban area of Rajshahi city), in 2011. Catastrophic expenditure was estimated at 40% threshold of household capacity to pay. We employed the Bayesian two-stage hurdle model and Bayesian logistic regression model to estimate age-adjusted average cost and the incidence of household financial catastrophe for each illness, respectively.

resultsOverall, approximately 45% of the population of Bangladesh had at least one episode of illness. The age-sex-adjusted average medical expenses and catastrophic health care expenditure among the households were TK 621 and 8%, respectively. Households spent the highest amount of money 7676.9 on paralysis followed by liver disease (TK 2695.4), injury (TK 2440.0), mental disease (TK 2258.0), and tumor (TK 2231.2). These diseases were also responsible for higher incidence of financial catastrophe. Our study showed that 24% of individuals who suffered typhoid incurred catastrophic expenditure followed by liver disease (12.3%), tumor (12.1%), heart disease (8.4%), injury (7.9%), mental disease (7.9%), cataract (7.1%), and paralysis (6.5%).

conclusionThe study findings suggest that chronic illnesses were responsible for high costs and high catastrophic expenditures in Bangladesh. Effective risk pooling mechanism might reduce household financial burden related to illnesses. Chronic illness related to NCDs is the major cause of OOP. It is also important to consider prioritizing vulnerable population by subsidizing the high health care cost for some of the chronic illnesses.

Indexed as

AdultBangladeshBayes TheoremCost of IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansInterviews as TopicLiver DiseasesMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedUrban PopulationWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID31935266
PMCPMC6959568
OpenAlexW2999274207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.