Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31934958›Full record

ArticleMedical care2020

The Impact of Massachusetts Health Reform on Colorectal and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.

Lindsay M Sabik, Kirsten Y Eom, Bassam Dahman, Jie Li, Nengliang Yao, G J van Londen, Cathy J Bradley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Survival inequity in vulnerable populations with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a United States safety-net collaborative analysis.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Gland surgery · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lindsay M SabikDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Kirsten Y EomDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Bassam DahmanDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Jie LiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Nengliang YaoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
G J van LondenDepartment of Medicine, Divisions of Hematology-Oncology and Geriatric Medicine, Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Cathy J BradleyUniversity of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO.

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examines the expansion of health insurance coverage in Massachusetts under state health reform as a natural experiment to investigate whether expanded insurance coverage reduced the likelihood of advanced stage colorectal cancer (CRC) and breast cancer (BCA) diagnosis.

methodsOur study populations include CRC or BCA patients aged 50-64 years observed in the Massachusetts Cancer Registry and Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries for 2001-2013. We use difference-in-differences regression models to estimate changes in the likelihood of advanced stage diagnosis after Massachusetts health reform, relative to comparison states without expanded coverage (Connecticut, New Jersey, Georgia, Kentucky, and Michigan).

resultsWe find some suggestive evidence of a decline in the proportion of advanced stage CRC cases. Approximately half of the CRC patients in Massachusetts and control states were diagnosed at advanced stages pre reform; there was a 2 percentage-point increase in this proportion across control states and slight decline in Massachusetts post reform. Adjusted difference-in-difference estimates suggest a 3.4 percentage-point (P=0.005) or 7% decline, relative to Massachusetts baseline, in the likelihood of advanced stage diagnosis after the reform in Massachusetts, though this result is sensitive to years included in the analysis. We did not find a significant effect of reform on BCA stage at diagnosis.

conclusionsThe decline in the likelihood of advanced stage CRC diagnosis after Massachusetts health reform may suggest improvements in access to health care and CRC screening. Similar declines were not observed for BCA, perhaps due to established BCA-specific safety-net programs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Care ReformHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSEER Program

Identifiers

PMID31934958
PMCPMC6964255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.