Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31934891›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2020

Environmental mixtures and children's health: identifying appropriate statistical approaches.

Eva Tanner, Alison Lee, Elena Colicino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.Environmental health perspectives · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Environmental Mixtures Analysis (E-MIX) Workflow and Methods Repository.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A State-of-the-Science Review on Metal Biomarkers.Current environmental health reports · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Microplastics, environment and child health.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eva TannerDepartment of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Alison LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Elena ColicinoDepartment of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Funding

Statistical Services and Methods Development ResourceU2CES026555 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI TEITELBAUM, SUSAN L · 2015 to 2025
$26.4M
The Mount Sinai Transdisciplinary Center on Early Environmental ExposuresP30ES023515 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Maria Jose Rosa · 2014 to 2026
$21.3M
Maternal trauma, circulating microRNA in extracellular vesicles, and programming of childhood respiratory outcomesR01MD013310 · NIMHD · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI LEE, ALISON G · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
Prenatal metal mixtures and neurodevelopment: Role of placental extracellular microRNAsR01ES030302 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI LU, QUAN, WRIGHT, ROSALIND J · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Methods for Data Integration and Risk Assessment for Environmental MixturesR01ES028811 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI COULL, BRENT ANDREW, GENNINGS, CHRIS · 2018 to 2021
$1.9M
Prenatal PM2.5 and programming of respiratory outcomes: Placental biomarkers and effect modification by stressK23HL135349 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI LEE, ALISON G · 2017 to 2021
$884k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL135349NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES023515NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES028811NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030302NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026555NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewBiomonitoring studies have shown that children are constantly exposed to complex patterns of chemical and nonchemical exposures. Here, we briefly summarize the rationale for studying multiple exposures, also called mixture, in relation to child health and key statistical approaches that can be used. We discuss advantages over traditional methods, limitations and appropriateness of the context. RECENT

findingsNew approaches allow pediatric researchers to answer increasingly complex questions related to environmental mixtures. We present methods to identify the most relevant exposures among a high-multitude of variables, via shrinkage and variable selection techniques, and identify the overall mixture effect, via Weighted Quantile Sum and Bayesian Kernel Machine regressions. We then describe novel extensions that handle high-dimensional exposure data and allow identification of critical exposure windows. SUMMARY: Recent advances in statistics and machine learning enable researchers to identify important mixture components, estimate joint mixture effects and pinpoint critical windows of exposure. Despite many advantages over single chemical approaches, measurement error and biases may be amplified in mixtures research, requiring careful study planning and design. Future research requires increased collaboration between epidemiologists, statisticians and data scientists, and further integration with causal inference methods.

Indexed as

Child HealthEnvironmental HealthBayes TheoremChildEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsHumansResearch DesignEnvironmental Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID31934891
PMCPMC7895326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.