Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31934845›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2020

Group cognitive rehabilitation to reduce the psychological impact of multiple sclerosis on quality of life: the CRAMMS RCT.

Nadina B Lincoln, Lucy E Bradshaw, Cris S Constantinescu, Florence Day, Avril Er Drummond, Deborah Fitzsimmons, Shaun Harris, Alan A Montgomery, Roshan das Nair

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of pragmatic randomized trials in multiple sclerosis: A systematic overview.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Memory rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Motor, cognitive, and combined rehabilitation approaches on MS patients' cognitive impairment.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Trial
  7. Measuring health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: comparing the acceptability, validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and MSIS-8D.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. What clinicians could consider in providing group interventions for people with cognitive impairments: a scoping review.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The impact of cognitive rehabilitation on quality of life in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nadina B LincolnDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Lucy E BradshawNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Cris S ConstantinescuDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Florence DayNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Avril Er DrummondSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Deborah FitzsimmonsSwansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Shaun HarrisSwansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Alan A MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Roshan das NairInstitute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBSwansea University · GBInstitute of Mental Health · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/12/190/05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with multiple sclerosis have problems with memory and attention. The effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation has not been established.

objectivesThe objectives were to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a cognitive rehabilitation programme for people with multiple sclerosis.

designThis was a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in which participants were randomised in a ratio of 6 : 5 to receive cognitive rehabilitation plus usual care or usual care alone. Participants were assessed at 6 and 12 months after randomisation.

settingThe trial was set in hospital neurology clinics and community services.

participantsParticipants were people with multiple sclerosis who had cognitive problems, were aged 18-69 years, could travel to attend group sessions and gave informed consent.

interventionThe intervention was a group cognitive rehabilitation programme delivered weekly by an assistant psychologist to between four and six participants for 10 weeks.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale - Psychological subscale at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included results from the Everyday Memory Questionnaire, the 30-Item General Health Questionnaire, the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version and a service use questionnaire from participants, and the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - relative version and the Modified Carer Strain Index from a relative or friend of the participant.

resultsOf the 449 participants randomised, 245 were allocated to cognitive rehabilitation (intervention group) and 204 were allocated to usual care (control group). Of these, 214 in the intervention group and 173 in the control group were included in the primary analysis. There was no clinically important difference in the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale - Psychological subscale score between the two groups at the 12-month follow-up (adjusted difference in means -0.6, 95% confidence interval -1.5 to 0.3; LIMITATIONS: The trial included a sample of participants who had relatively severe cognitive problems in daily life. The trial was not powered to perform subgroup analyses. Participants could not be blinded to treatment allocation.

conclusionsThis cognitive rehabilitation programme had no long-term benefits on quality of life for people with multiple sclerosis. FUTURE WORK: Future research should evaluate the selection of those who may benefit from cognitive rehabilitation.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN09697576.

fundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionPsychotherapy, GroupTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCOGNITIONCOGNITIVE REHABILITATIONCOST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSISMEMORYMEMORY PROBLEMSMEMORY REHABILITATIONMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Identifiers

PMID31934845
PMCPMC6983911
OpenAlexW3000623080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.