Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31934631›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

Cuttlefish use stereopsis to strike at prey.

R C Feord, M E Sumner, S Pusdekar, L Kalra, P T Gonzalez-Bellido, Trevor J Wardill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cephalopod Behavior: From Neural Plasticity to Consciousness.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Visual computation in the cephalopod brain.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of the Binocular Circuit.Annual review of neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Visual guidance fine-tunes probing movements of an insect appendage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Editorial: Prey-predator interactions.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. New Approaches to 3D Vision.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Stereopsis without correspondence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R C FeordDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-8137
M E SumnerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8759-1031
S PusdekarDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
L KalraDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
P T Gonzalez-BellidoDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2201-991X
Trevor J WardillDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2049-113X
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The camera-type eyes of vertebrates and cephalopods exhibit remarkable convergence, but it is currently unknown whether the mechanisms for visual information processing in these brains, which exhibit wildly disparate architecture, are also shared. To investigate stereopsis in a cephalopod species, we affixed "anaglyph" glasses to cuttlefish and used a three-dimensional perception paradigm. We show that (i) cuttlefish have also evolved stereopsis (i.e., the ability to extract depth information from the disparity between left and right visual fields); (ii) when stereopsis information is intact, the time and distance covered before striking at a target are shorter; (iii) stereopsis in cuttlefish works differently to vertebrates, as cuttlefish can extract stereopsis cues from anticorrelated stimuli. These findings demonstrate that although there is convergent evolution in depth computation, cuttlefish stereopsis is likely afforded by a different algorithm than in humans, and not just a different implementation.

Indexed as

AnimalsDecapodiformesDepth PerceptionEye MovementsImaging, Three-DimensionalPredatory BehaviorVision, Binocular

Identifiers

PMID31934631
PMCPMC6949036
OpenAlexW2999544232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.