Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31934429›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2019

Perceived effectiveness of complementary medicine by mothers of infants with colic in Gauteng.

Natalie C Di Gaspero, Radmila Razlog, Reshma Patel, Janice Pellow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalie C Di GasperoDepartment of Homoeopathy, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9813-2348
Radmila RazlogDepartment of Homoeopathy, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9682-6285
Reshma PatelDepartment of Homoeopathy, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-610X
Janice PellowDepartment of Homoeopathy, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0015-8302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfantile colic is a self-limiting condition, characterised by spasmodic, excessive and inconsolable crying without apparent cause. Although common, there is no widely accepted conventional treatment approach for colic. Complementary medicine is often promoted as an alternative therapeutic option for infantile colic; however, there is limited research available on its use, safety and effectiveness.

aimThe aim of this study was to determine the perceived effectiveness of complementary medicine by mothers of infants with colic by means of the Infantile Colic Questionnaire.

settingMothers of infants who had colic were recruited from complementary medicine pharmacies, schools, baby clinics and various businesses in Gauteng, South Africa.

methodsA quantitative-descriptive design was used whereby data was collected through a randomised, cross-sectional questionnaire. The research sample consisted of 152 participants (mothers), aged between 18 and 45 years, with one or more children who suffered from symptoms of infantile colic, who had used complementary medicine as a form of treatment.

resultsResults indicated that most participants made use of both complementary and conventional medicines for their infant's colic; the most commonly used complementary medicine products were homeopathic remedies, probiotics and herbal medicines. Some participants were, however, unfamiliar with the term 'complementary medicine', indicating a need for further patient education.

conclusionsThe participants perceived complementary medicines as safe and effective forms of treatment for infantile colic. However, further, larger scale studies should be conducted to validate this finding.

Identifiers

PMID31934429
PMCPMC6917380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.