Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31934115›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2019

Comparison of endothelial cell- and endothelial progenitor cell-derived exosomes in promoting vascular endothelial cell repair.

Hui Hu, Chunyu Jiang, Ruiting Li, Jungong Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Clinical applications of stem cell-derived exosomes.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Treatment of Oxidative Stress with Exosomes in Myocardial Ischemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui HuInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital Shanghai, China.
Chunyu JiangInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital Shanghai, China.
Ruiting LiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital Shanghai, China.
Jungong ZhaoInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely endothelial repair after intervention-associated vascular injury is critical to prevent restenosis and thrombosis. Compared to living cell therapies, exosomes may be a better alternative. Thus, we aimed to compare the role of exosomes derived from human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) versus those derived from endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in vascular endothelial repair. MATERIAL/

methodsExosomes secreted from HUVECs and EPCs were isolated and characterized respectively. In vitro, the effects of the two types of exosomes on migration and proliferation of endothelial cells were studied. In vivo, rats were systemically treated with the two exosome groups respectively after carotid artery endothelial injury induced by a balloon. The efficacy in promoting re-endothelialization was measured by Evans blue dye and histological examination.

resultsBoth types of exosomes, sized from 30 nm to 100 nm, had sphere-shaped or cupped morphology, and expressed CD63, CD9, and CD81; but the total yield of exosomes (particles/mL) based on number of cells, was 4.2 times higher from EPCs than HUVECs. Compared with control treatment, both exosome treated groups manifested significant enhancement of migration and proliferation in vitro and vascular recovery at an early stage in vivo. The two exosome-treated groups, however, did not statistically significantly differ.

conclusionIn conclusion, our results indicated that exosomes derived from HUVECs and EPCs had similar morphology, size distributions and characteristics, but those derived from EPCs were more abundant with comparable biologic activity. Therefore, EPCs may be a robust source of exosomes to promote vascular repair.

Indexed as

endothelial cellsendothelial progenitor cellsExosomesHUVECsre-endothelialization

Identifiers

PMID31934115
PMCPMC6949553
OpenAlexW3005495156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.