ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2019
Expression of FXR and HRG and their clinicopathological significance in benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feedback Regulation of Pancreatic Juice Secretion in Pigs.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Construction of a novel risk model for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma associated with purinergic signaling pathways and chemoradiotherapy sensitivity genes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Gut-Liver-Pancreas Axis Crosstalk in Health and Disease: From the Role of Microbial Metabolites to Innovative Microbiota Manipulating Strategies.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- The Role of Bile Acids in Pancreatic Cancer.Current cancer drug targets · 2024Review
- Targeting Farnesoid X Receptor in Tumor and the Tumor Microenvironment: Implication for Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Farnesoid X receptor activation inhibits pancreatic carcinogenesis.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2023Article
- Review
- Impact of gut microbiome in the development and treatment of pancreatic cancer: Newer insights.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Identification and Interaction Analysis of Molecular Markers in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Bioinformatics and Next-Generation Sequencing Data Analysis.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2023Article
- Identification of potential core genes in colorectal carcinoma and key genes in colorectal cancer liver metastasis using bioinformatics analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Targeting Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) for developing novel therapeutics against cancer.Molecular biomedicine · 2021Review
- Farnesoid X receptor: a potential therapeutic target in multiple organs.Histology and histopathology · 2020Review
- Decreased expression of farnesoid X receptor may indicate poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe following study examines the FXR and HRG expression in benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas and evaluates the association between FXR and HRG expression with clinicopathological features and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsImmunohistochemistry of FXR and HRG was performed with EnVision™ in 106 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) specimens, 35 paracancer samples (2 cm away from the tumor, when possible or available), 55 benign lesions and 13 normal tissue samples.
resultsThe percentage of cases with positive FXR and negative HRG expression was significantly higher in PDAC compared to pericancerous tissues, benign lesions and normal tissues (P<0.05 or P<0.01). In pancreatic tissues with benign lesions, tissues with positive FXR and/or negative HRG protein expression exhibited dysplasia or intraepithelial neoplasia. The percentage of cases with positive FXR and negative HRG expressions was significantly higher in PDAC with lymph node metastasis, invasion, and TNM stage III+IV disease (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The expression of FXR was negatively correlated with HRG (P<0.05). In addition, the univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that positive FXR and negative HRG expression, poor differentiation, large tumor size, high TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, and invasion were closely associated with decreased overall survival in PDAC patients (P<0.05 or P<0.01). Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis identified that positive FXR and negative HRG expression were independent factors for poor prognosis in PDAC. The AUC for FXR was (AUC=0.709, 95% CI: 0.632-0.787), and for HRG was (AUC=0.719, 95% CI: 0.643-0.796) in PDAC compared to benign lesions.
conclusionsPositive FXR and negative HRG expression are closely associated with the carcinogenesis, clinical, pathological and biological behaviors, and poor prognosis in PDAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31934033PMC6949611W3010721288What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.