ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2019
A prognostic scoring model based on the HPV status of oropharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy in China.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPrognostic models that can predict prognosis and guide postoperative radiotherapy (PRT) and that are based on the human papillomavirus (HPV) status of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) in China are rare.
methodsSurvival was analyzed by performing a Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. A Cox regression analysis was performed for the multivariate analyses. A prognostic scoring model was constructed according to the regression coefficient obtained from the Cox regression model.
resultsA prognostic model that included gender, clinical stage, histologic stage, metastasis, and HPV status was created and used to divide patients into high-risk (PI ≥ -0.008) and low-risk (PI < -0.008) groups. The results showed that the patients who received PRT had a longer overall survival time than those who did not receive PRT (47.31 months vs. 28.31 months). Furthermore, the patients who received PRT in the high-risk group had a longer survival time when the survival was greater than 20 months (P = 0.024), and PRT may indicate a worse prognosis in the low-risk group (P = 0.071).
conclusionThis model will contribute to the formulation of individualized treatment programs for OPSCC patients. PRT should be administered to high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31934010PMC6947130W3006428826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.