Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933908›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2019

Differential expression of HSP90 isoforms and their correlations with clinicopathologic factors in patients with colorectal cancer.

Kisu Kim, Hyoun Wook Lee, Eun Hee Lee, Moon-Il Park, Jae Seok Lee, Mee-Seon Kim, Kyungeun Kim, Mee Sook Roh, Min Gyoung Pak, Ji Eun Oh and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kisu KimDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Changwon, South Korea.
Hyoun Wook LeeDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Changwon, South Korea.
Eun Hee LeeDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Changwon, South Korea.
Moon-Il ParkDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Changwon, South Korea.
Jae Seok LeeDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Changwon, South Korea.
Mee-Seon KimDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Changwon, South Korea.
Kyungeun KimDepartment of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Seoul, Korea.
Mee Sook RohDepartment of Pathology, Dong-A University College of Medicine Busan, South Korea.
Min Gyoung PakDepartment of Pathology, Dong-A University College of Medicine Busan, South Korea.
Ji Eun OhDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Changwon, South Korea.
Kwang Min KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Changwon, South Korea.
Jung Won LeeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Changwon, South Korea.
Tae Gyu KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Changwon, South Korea.
Hyun-Yeol NamDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Changwon, South Korea.
Samsung (South Korea) · KRDong-A University · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), a molecular chaperone, plays critical roles in cellular protection against various stressful stimuli and in the regulation of cellular growth and apoptosis. HSP90 has four human isoforms; HSP90α, HSP90β, glucose related protein 94 (GRP94), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated protein 1 (TRAP1). We evaluated the differential expression of these HSP90 isoforms in colorectal cancer (CRC) and correlated their expression levels with clinicopathological factors and patient survival rates. We performed immunohistochemical staining for HSP90α, HSP90β, GRP94, and TRAP1 in 129 CRC tumor samples and found that HSP90α expression was significantly associated with advanced pT stage (P = 0.011) and shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.010), whereas GRP94 expression was correlated with low grade (P = 0.029) and better RFS (P < 0.001). HSP90β and TRAP1 had no prognostic impact, although HSP90β expression was positively correlated with tumor size (P = 0.008). Based on our results, HSP90α and GRP94 are potential prognostic biomarkers of CRC. In addition, the differences in expression and functional activities among four HSP90 isoforms imply that isoform selectivity should be seriously considered when HSP90 inhibitors are studied or adopted for the treatment of CRC.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerGRP94HSP90immunohistochemistryprognosisTRAP1

Identifiers

PMID31933908
PMCPMC6945153
OpenAlexW3006360013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.