ReviewInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2019
Serum microRNA-195 as a potential diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of a circulating miR-6838-5p/miR-195-5p signature in invasive ductal breast carcinoma.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Non-Canonical Targets of MicroRNAs: Role in Transcriptional Regulation, Disease Pathogenesis and Potential for Therapeutic Targets.MicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates) · 2024Review
- Prognostic and diagnostic values of non-coding RNAs as biomarkers for breast cancer: An umbrella review and pan-cancer analysis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- Identification of Three Circulating MicroRNAs in Plasma as Clinical Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Detection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Anti-Tumor Mechanisms Associated With Regulation of Non-Coding RNA by Active Ingredients of Chinese Medicine: A Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serum microRNA-195 (miR-195) expression has been shown to be significantly up-regulated in breast cancer, which implies that it could be a useful biomarker in the early detection of breast cancer. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic value of miR-195 for breast cancer. Relevant articles were collected from PubMed, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane Library, BioMed Central, ISI Web of Knowledge, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Data and Technology of Chongqing databases, from inception to May 24, 2019, by two independent researchers. The diagnostic capacity of miR-195 for breast cancer was assessed using pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUC) and Fagan's nomogram. Meta-analysis and heterogeneity source investigation were completed using Meta-Disc statistical software and Stata SE (version 14.0). Six studies with a total of 464 patients and 287 healthy controls were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled results for sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.83), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.90) and 32.05 (95% CI: 17.04-60.30), respectively; positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.18 and 0.20, and AUC was 0.9197 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91). In addition, heterogeneity was clearly apparent but was not caused by the threshold effect. In summary, this meta-analysis revealed that miR-195 may be suitable as a potential biomarker for early diagnosis of breast cancer with high sensitivity and specificity, and further investigations are needed to demonstrate its clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31933794PMC6949784W3006167037What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.